Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713116›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2020

Probiotic Supplementation and Food Intake and Knowledge Among Patients and Consumers.

M Nguyen, K K Ferge, A R Vaughn, W Burney, L H Teng, A Pan, V Nguyen, Raja K Sivamani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. In vitro characterization of probiotic properties of isolated and grown co-cultures on halophyte-based substrate.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbiological Testing of Probiotic Preparations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M NguyenDepartment of Dermatology, University of California - Davis, 3301 C Street, Suite 1400, Sacramento, CA, 95816, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8763-3860
K K FergeDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento, Sacramento, CA, USA.
A R VaughnDepartment of Dermatology, University of California - Davis, 3301 C Street, Suite 1400, Sacramento, CA, 95816, USA.
W BurneyDepartment of Dermatology, University of California - Davis, 3301 C Street, Suite 1400, Sacramento, CA, 95816, USA.
L H TengUniversity of California - Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
A PanCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, CA, USA.
V NguyenUniversity of California - Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Raja K SivamaniDepartment of Dermatology, University of California - Davis, 3301 C Street, Suite 1400, Sacramento, CA, 95816, USA. raja.sivamani.md@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consumption of probiotics has gained popularity, highlighting the importance for consumers and clinicians to be aware of their compositions and health effects. The primary objective was to determine incentives for taking probiotics and knowledge about probiotic composition among consumers of various education levels, ethnicities, and locations. A secondary objective was to determine brands, dosages, prices, advertised benefits, and refrigeration status of commercially available probiotics in the Sacramento region. This was a voluntary anonymous online survey conducted from May to August 2017. Surveys were administered at the University of California Davis (UCD) Dermatology Clinic, as well as at approved locations within a 100-mi. radius. Data analysis was performed at the UCD Dermatology clinic. Eligible participants age 18 years and older were asked to complete a voluntary anonymous online survey. A random sample of participants were recruited from the UCD Dermatology clinic, local schools, and health food stores within the designated parameters. We collected 396 surveys, 97% of which were completed. Of those surveyed, 39.4% have previously taken probiotics, 44.6% could identify at least one species present in their supplement, 42.5% could identify the number of strains, and 33.0% could identify the dosage. Gut health was the most common reason for taking probiotics (58.1%). Most rated price as important when purchasing probiotics (70.3%). Although probiotic use is prevalent in Sacramento, most people are unfamiliar with the composition of their supplement. More evidence is needed to guide consumers in making more educated decisions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeProbioticsAdultHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthProbioticSupplementsSurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.