Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713099›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2020

Liking and left amygdala activity during food versus nonfood processing are modulated by emotional context.

Isabel García-García, Jana Kube, Filip Morys, Anne Schrimpf, Ahmad S Kanaan, Michael Gaebler, Arno Villringer, Alain Dagher, Annette Horstmann, Jane Neumann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lateralization of the 5-HTAmino acids · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isabel García-GarcíaMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, room NW252, H3A 2B4, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. isabel.garciagarcia@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5873-2664
Jana KubeMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Filip MorysMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, room NW252, H3A 2B4, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anne SchrimpfMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Ahmad S KanaanMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael GaeblerMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Arno VillringerMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Alain DagherMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, room NW252, H3A 2B4, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Annette HorstmannMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Jane NeumannMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotions can influence our eating behaviors. Facing an acute stressor or being in a positive mood are examples of situations that tend to modify appetite. However, the question of how the brain integrates these emotion-related changes in food processing remains elusive. Here, we designed an emotional priming fMRI task to test if amygdala activity during food pictures differs depending on the emotional context. Fifty-eight female participants completed a novel emotional priming task, in which emotional images of negative, neutral, or positive situations were followed by pictures of either foods or objects. After priming in each trial, participants rated how much they liked the shown foods or objects. We analyzed how brain activity during the contrast "foods > objects" changed according to the emotional context-in the whole brain and in the amygdala. We also examined the potential effect of adiposity (i.e., waist circumference). We observed a higher difference between liking scores for foods and objects after positive priming than after neutral priming. In the left amygdala, activity in the contrast "foods > objects" was higher after neutral priming relative to negative priming. Waist circumference was not significantly related to this emotional priming effect on food processing. Our results suggest that emotional context alters food and nonfood perception, both in terms of liking scores and with regard to engagement of the left amygdala. Moreover, our findings indicate that emotional context has an impact on the salience advantage of food, possibly affecting eating behavior.

Indexed as

FoodAdolescentAdultAffectAmygdalaBrain MappingEmotionsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationAmygdalaEatingEmotional primingFood cue reactivityNeuroimaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.