Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713069›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2020

[Keratoplasty in children : Indications and results].

S J Lang, D Böhringer, T Reinhard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Optical rehabilitation and pediatric ophthalmological care following keratoplasty for childhood corneal opacities].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Review
  3. Current Perspectives on Corneal Transplantation (Part 2).Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S J LangKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Kilianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. stefan.lang@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
D BöhringerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Kilianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
T ReinhardKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Kilianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Ophthalmology Clinic · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penetrating keratoplasty in children is associated with very specific difficulties for the surgeon as well as for the patient and the parents. Special features are specific pediatric indications, which do not occur in adults, a more difficult examination and treatment adherence depending on the parents. Diseases with a favorable prognosis include keratoconus and herpetic keratitis. Especially sclerocornea and the Peters' anomaly often have a limited prognosis regarding vision and graft survival due to secondary malformations of the eye. In addition, younger age represents a risk factor. This is most likely due to the impaired examination during follow-up and reduced compliance. For successful penetrating keratoplasty in children the timing for the operation, in which the risk for the graft is weighed up against the risk for amblyopia, is crucial.

Indexed as

Corneal OpacityCorneal TransplantationChildFollow-Up StudiesHumansKeratoplasty, PenetratingPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesIndicationsKeratoconusPeters’ anomalySclerocorneaTiming of surgery

Identifiers

PMID31713069
OpenAlexW2987144751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.