Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713016›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Microscopic brain invasion in meningiomas previously classified as WHO grade I is not associated with patient outcome.

Annamaria Biczok, Christine Jungk, Rupert Egensperger, Andreas von Deimling, Bogdana Suchorska, Joerg C Tonn, Christel Herold-Mende, Christian Schichor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Meningiomas with CNS invasion.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular neuropathology of brain-invasive meningiomas.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annamaria BiczokDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. annamaria.biczok@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2890-5664
Christine JungkGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rupert EgenspergerCenter for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas von DeimlingGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bogdana SuchorskaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Joerg C TonnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christel Herold-MendeGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian SchichorDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor meningiomas, the 2016 revision of the WHO classification introduced brain invasion per se as a sufficient condition to classify as grade II. We analyzed whether meningiomas previously graded as WHO grade I differ in prognosis depending on the presence of microscopic brain invasion.

methodsA consecutive series of patients with intracranial meningioma WHO grade I (± brain invasion) at two neurosurgical departments was analyzed retrospectively. Cox regression models on progression-free survival (PFS) and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were performed.

results875 adult patients were included. Histological diagnosis of brain invasion was confirmed in 28 patients. Median follow-up was 73 months. In univariate and multivariate models, gross total resection gained favorable prognostic influence for PFS (p < 0.001, HR: 0.237, CI 0.170-0.382). 170 patients with the brain/meningioma interface present in histopathological specimen were separately analyzed as a subgroup. Importantly, presence of brain invasion did not reach significance for PFS, even in the subgroup with available specimen of brain/meningioma interface (p = 0.787, HR: 0.852, CI 0.268-2.710 and p = 0.811, HR: 0.848, CI 0.222-3.246, respectively). Patients with and without brain invasion did not differ in terms of age, tumor location and extent of resection, but were more likely to receive radiotherapy (p = 0.03) of tumor remnants. However, subgroup analysis of non-irradiated tumors revealed no prognostic influence of brain invasion (p = 0.749, HR: 0.772, CI 0.158-3.767).

conclusionsIn this bi-institutional series, brain invasion was frequent among meningiomas WHO grade I when brain/meningioma interface was available for histology (16.5%). However, brain invasion did not impact early recurrence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalYoung AdultMeningiomaMicroscopic brain invasionPrognostic factorWHO grade I

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.