Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712971›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2020

S-Adenosylmethionine (SAMe) monotherapy for depression: an 8-week double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

Jerome Sarris, Jenifer Murphy, Con Stough, David Mischoulon, Chad Bousman, Patricia MacDonald, Laura Adams, Sonia Nazareth, Georgina Oliver, Lachlan Cribb and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. New agents and perspectives in the pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Annals of general psychiatry · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jerome SarrisNICM Health Research Institute, Westmead, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. j.sarris@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9287-8854
Jenifer MurphyProfessorial Unit, The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Con StoughCentre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
David MischoulonDepression Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Chad BousmanDepartments of Medical Genetics, Psychiatry, and Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Patricia MacDonaldFaculty of Medicine, Discipline of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Laura AdamsFaculty of Medicine, Discipline of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sonia NazarethFaculty of Medicine, Discipline of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Georgina OliverProfessorial Unit, The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Lachlan CribbProfessorial Unit, The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Karen SavageProfessorial Unit, The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Ranjit MenonProfessorial Unit, The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Suneel ChamoliFaculty of Medicine, Discipline of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Michael BerkDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Chee H NgProfessorial Unit, The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Gerard J ByrneFaculty of Medicine, Discipline of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Queensland · AUBarwon Health · AUHarvard University · USSwinburne University of Technology · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1048222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDysregulation of the one carbon cycle is documented in depression. Thereby, S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), a one-carbon cycle nutraceutical compound with a favourable side effect profile, has a theoretical rationale for efficacy. However, further controlled studies are required to confirm SAMe's efficacy.

objectivesTo test the efficacy of SAMe versus placebo in unmedicated DSM-5 diagnosed (major depressive disorder) (MDD) patients with mild-to-moderate levels of depressive symptoms.

methodsWe conducted an 8-week, double-blind, randomised controlled trial testing 800 mg/day of SAMe monotherapy versus placebo in 49 patients with MDD (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score 14-25) who were not currently taking antidepressants. One-carbon cycle biomarkers, brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), and relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analysed as potential treatment moderators.

resultsA clinically relevant differential reduction from baseline to week 8 of 3.76 points occurred on the primary outcome (MADRS) in favour of SAMe. This however was not significant (p = 0.13) on an adjusted linear mixed model, notwithstanding a medium to large effect size of 0.72. A high placebo response rate of 53% occurred (> 50% reduction on MADRS). Exploratory analyses showed that SAMe was however effective in reducing depression amongst participants with milder depression severity (MADRS ≤ 22, p = 0.045). Response was not moderated by BDNF, SNPs, or one-carbon cycle biomarkers, although increased folate concentrations were correlated with improved symptoms in the SAMe group (r = - 0.57, p = 0.026). The treatment was safe and well tolerated.

conclusionsAlthough a differential reduction in depression symptoms between groups was observed in favour of SAMe, the results of this pilot study were not statistically significant.

trial registrationANZCTR-Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; No.: ACTRN12613001299796; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364900.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsAustraliaDepressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsS-AdenosylmethionineTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsS-AdenosylmethionineAntidepressantClinical trialDepressionNutraceuticalS-Adenosylmethionine

Identifiers

PMID31712971
OpenAlexW2986433923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.