ReviewDer Pathologe2019
[Current developments in lung transplantation].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and evaluation of a Mobile-Based decision support system to enhance lung transplant candidate assessment and management: knowledge translation integrated with clinical workflow.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Cost drivers in the pharmacological treatment of interstitial lung disease.Respiratory research · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung transplantation is the established treatment of benign end-stage pulmonary diseases after failure of alternative surgical and medical treatment options. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of current developments in selected fields of lung transplantation.
methodsA selective literature search was conducted.
resultsLung transplantation in Germany is currently limited by a donor organ shortage. Measures to increase organ donation rates and to optimize the use of available donor organs are required. Ex-vivo lung perfusion, currently mainly used to re-evaluate marginal donor organs, has the potential to increase the available donor pool and to serve as a platform for additional therapies.
conclusionsRefinements in organ allocation, perioperative management, immunosuppression, and in the understanding of acute cellular and humoral rejection as well as chronic lung allograft dysfunction contributed to improvements in long-term outcome after lung transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31712888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.