Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712872›Full record

ArticleDer Internist2020

[Multiple recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma in a 66-year-old man].

I Niemetz, J Faß, M Wolf

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Internist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I Niemetz, Postfach 10 27 06, 34027, Kassel, Deutschland. info@internisten-kassel.de.
J FaßKlinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland.
M WolfKlinik für Onkologie und Hämatologie, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, the authors present the case of a 66-year-old man who was diagnosed with the first recurrence of his retroperitoneal liposarcoma 7 years after initial diagnosis. In the following 10 years, he needed a total of eight operations, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy because of another seven recurrences. This is the first report on a patient with eight recurrences of a retroperitoneal liposarcoma being in a relatively good general condition even 17 years after initial diagnosis.

Indexed as

LiposarcomaRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalChemotherapy, adjuvantHemocolectomyNeoplasms, connective and soft tissueQuality of lifeRetroperitoneal liposarcoma, recurrence

Identifiers

PMID31712872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.