ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2019
[Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of testicular tumours].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Application Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Testicular Occupied Lesions.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- [Testicular tumors in prepubertal boys-organ preservation possible more often than expected].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scrotal ultrasound with high-resolution transducers and additional display of vascularisation in colour-coded ultrasonography is the method of choice for the detection and characterisation of testicular tumors. Within the last decade, testicular ultrasonography has been further refined and improved by the possibilities of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).CEUS may be especially helpful in the assessment of vascularisation disorders (e.g., incomplete torsion, segmental perfusion disorders, abscesses) or testicular foci remaining equivocal even after colour-coded ultrasonography.The basic idea in the application of CEUS in scrotal sonography is the possibility to differentiate between avascular, hypo- and hypervascular findings, with a lack of perfusion generally considered as a sign of benignity. Vice versa, detection of vascularisation speaks for neoplasia but not necessarily for malignity (e.g., Leydig cell tumors). CEUS is especially valuable in the correct classification of small (<1.5 cm) testicular foci.This review summarizes the present knowledge on indications, implications and limitations of the application of CEUS in testicular tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31712858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.