Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712834›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2020

[Discussion paper for a hospital financing reform in Germany from the perspective of intensive care medicine].

Reimer Riessen, Andreas Markewitz, Maja Grigoleit, Christian Karagiannidis, Christian Waydhas, Thomas van den Hooven, Carsten Hermes, Stefan John, Hilmar Burchardi, Martin Möckel and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Reimer RiessenInternistische Intensivstation, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Otfried-Müller Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. reimer.riessen@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Andreas Markewitz, Am Goldberg 24, 56170, Bendorf, Deutschland.
Maja GrigoleitDokumentation und Medizincontrolling, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 6, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Christian KaragiannidisECMO-Zentrum, Lungenklinik Köln-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Köln, Deutschland.
Christian WaydhasChirurgische Intensivstation, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Deutschland.
Thomas van den HoovenPflegedirektion, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
Carsten Hermes, Friedrich-Ebert-Str. 60, 53177, Bonn, Deutschland.
Stefan JohnUniversitätsklinik Medizinische Klinik 8 - Kardiologie, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Nürnberg & Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Hilmar Burchardi, Kiefernweg 2, 37120, Bovenden, Deutschland.
Martin MöckelNotfall- und Akutmedizin, Zentrale Notaufnahmen, Campus Mitte und Virchow, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Uwe JanssensKlinik für Innere Medizin und Internistische Intensivmedizin, St.-Antonius-Hospital, Dechant-Deckers-Str. 8, 52249, Eschweiler, Deutschland.
Ulf DennlerGeschäftsbereich Medizincontrolling, München Klinik, Thalkirchner Str. 48, 80337, München, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin (DGIIN)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Germany, there are currently many voices calling for a reform of hospital planning and reimbursement to correct some aberrations of the last decades and to enable the system to cope with future challenges. Some recent political decisions to change the structures of emergency medical services as well as the introduction of mandatory nurse-to-patient ratios and the exclusion of the cost for nursing from the case-based hospital reimbursement represent first steps of a reform, which also affects intensive care and emergency medicine. In this discussion paper a group of intensivists, emergency physicians, medical controllers, and representatives of nurses suggest more far-reaching changes, which can be summarized in 5 points: (1) General hospitals with intensive care units (ICU) and emergency departments (ED) which are part of the emergency medical system should be considered as an element of public service and be planned accordingly. (2) The planning of the intensive care infrastructure should be based on the three levels of emergency medical services to identify hospitals that are system relevant and to define appropriate criteria for structure and quality measures. (3) Hospital reimbursement should consist of a base amount (covering costs for hospital staff, infrastructure plus investments) and case-based fees (covering material costs). (4) To determine the requirements for nurses, physicians, and other medical staff, adequate tools for ICU and ED should be applied. (5) For these purposes as well as for quality management and optimal medical care, hospitals should be provided with a substantially improved IT-infrastructure.

Indexed as

Critical CareFinancial Management, HospitalIntensive Care UnitsCosts and Cost AnalysisEmergency Service, HospitalGermanyHumansDiagnosis-related groupsHospital costsHospital planningIntensive care medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.