Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712769›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2020

Effects of enteral nutritional rich in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on the nutritional status of gastrointestinal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guang-Ying Wan, Li-Yuan Zheng, Hui-Qin Li, Hua Yuan, Hui Xue, Xiu-Ying Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy ofInternational journal of clinical practice · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guang-Ying WanDepartment of Fundamental Nursing, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, PR China.
Li-Yuan ZhengDepartment of Fundamental Nursing, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, PR China.
Hui-Qin LiDepartment of Fundamental Nursing, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, PR China.
Hua YuanDepartment of Fundamental Nursing, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, PR China.
Hui XueDepartment of Histology and Embryology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, PR China. xuehui@jlu.edu.cn.
Xiu-Ying ZhangDepartment of Fundamental Nursing, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, PR China. z_xy@jlu.edu.cn.
Jilin University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31800895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative malnutrition is a major issue among gastrointestinal cancer patients. Because n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) have immunological benefits, n-3 PUFAs are widely used in oral nutritional supplements (ONS). However, n-3 PUFAs in ONS reduced patients' compliance with ONS and affected the role of ONS in maintaining the postoperative nutritional status of patients. The aim of this study was to systematically explore the benefits of enteral nutrition rich in n-3 PUFAs in maintaining the nutritional status of patients after gastrointestinal surgery. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched through March 16, 2019. The references of related reviews and studies were assessed up to March 16, 2019. The effect sizes from individual studies were calculated as the standardized mean difference (SMD), mean difference (MD), and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). A total of 11 studies (n = 977) were included. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we observed that enteral supplementation of n-3 PUFAs had no significant effect on weight (MD, 1.09; 95% CI, -0.90, 3.08), body mass index (MD, 0.55; 95% CI, -1.45, 2.54), albumin (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI, -0.10, 0.87), wound infections (RR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.57, 1.33), or pneumonia (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.60, 1.59) in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Thus, compared with enteral nutritional without n-3 PUFAs, enteral nutritional rich in n-3 PUFAs has no significant effects on nutritional status, incidence of pneumonia, or wound infections among gastrointestinal cancer patients during postoperative convalescence.

Indexed as

Fatty Acids, Omega-3Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsChinaEnteral NutritionHumansNutritional StatusFatty Acids, Omega-3

Identifiers

PMID31712769
OpenAlexW2985616661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.