ArticleScientific reports2019
Proposal for a Quantitative
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- FDG-PET medullary total tumor volume highlights high-risk patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in CASSIOPEIA trial.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Application of an artificial intelligence-based tool in [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Trial
- AI-Quantified ¹¹C-MET PET/CT bone marrow metabolic activity for prognostic assessment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Fifteen years of use of functional imaging in multiple myeloma: where we started and where we are going.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Powered CT-Less Multitracer Organ Segmentation From PET Images: A Solution for Unreliable CT Segmentation in PET/CT Imaging.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Illuminating the Shadows: Innovation in Advanced Imaging Techniques for Myeloma Precursor Conditions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-based, volumetric assessment of the bone marrow metabolic activity in [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of visual IMPeTUs criteria and metabolic tumor burden at baseline [EJNMMI research · 2024Article
- Recent advances in imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) for quantitative assessment of multiple myeloma.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Positron Emission Tomography-Derived Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Multiple Myeloma: State-of-the-Art.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- First-in-Humans Evaluation of Safety and Dosimetry ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Shutting off the fuel supply to target metabolic vulnerabilities in multiple myeloma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Semi-automated histogram analysis of normal bone marrow usingBMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Imaging and biopsy of HIV-infected individuals undergoing analytic treatment interruption.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Metabolic Volume Measurements in Multiple Myeloma.Metabolites · 2021Review
- Docetaxel and Lidocaine Co-Loaded (NLC-in-Hydrogel) Hybrid System Designed for the Treatment of Melanoma.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- A proposed index of diffuse bone marrow [18F]-FDG uptake and PET skeletal patterns correlate with myeloma prognostic markers, plasma cell morphology, and response to therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Quantitative, DynamicDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Marrow uptake on FDG PET/CT is associated with progression from smoldering to symptomatic multiple myeloma.Skeletal radiology · 2021Article
- 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT have similar performance but different imaging patterns in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Nuclear medicine communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many efforts have been made to standardize the interpretation of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.