Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712682›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Declining maerl vitality and habitat complexity across a dredging gradient: Insights from in situ sediment profile imagery (SPI).

Guillaume Bernard, Alicia Romero-Ramirez, Adeline Tauran, Michael Pantalos, Bruno Deflandre, Jacques Grall, Antoine Grémare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guillaume BernardCNRS, EPOC, UMR 5805, F-33615, Pessac, France. guillaume.bernard@u-bordeaux.fr.
Alicia Romero-RamirezUniversité de Bordeaux, EPOC, UMR 5805, F-33615, Pessac, France.
Adeline TauranUniversité de Bordeaux, EPOC, UMR 5805, F-33615, Pessac, France.
Michael PantalosIUEM UMS 3113, UBO, Brest, France.
Bruno DeflandreUniversité de Bordeaux, EPOC, UMR 5805, F-33615, Pessac, France.
Jacques GrallIUEM UMS 3113, UBO, Brest, France.
Antoine GrémareUniversité de Bordeaux, EPOC, UMR 5805, F-33615, Pessac, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maerl beds form complex biogenic benthic habitats, characterized by high productivity as well as diverse biological communities. Disturbances associated with extraction and/or fishing activities using mobile bottom-contacting gears such as clam-dredges induce the most severe and long-term effects on these fragile habitats. We here investigated the effects of dredge-fishing on maerl in the bay of Brest (France). We quantified maerl beds structure and vitality across a fine scale quantified dredging intensity gradient through the acquisition of in-situ images of beds cross-section using Sediment Profile Imaging system (SPI). Declines in the proxies of maerl vitality and habitat complexity were measured across the gradient, and were associated with significant changes in the vertical distribution of live and dead maerl as well as of interstitial space. Fishing with dredges caused maerl mortality, substratum compaction, and decreasing habitat complexity. SPI imaging techniques also allowed for an assessment of changes in spatial heterogeneity that dredging created on several aspects of the structure and vitality of maerl beds. It suggests that direct and indirect disturbances induced by dredging are not acting at the same spatial scale, and can thereby differentially affect the ecosystem functions linked to vitality and habitat complexity.

Identifiers

PMID31712682
PMCPMC6848171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.