ArticleScientific reports2019
Range Variability in CMR Feature Tracking Multilayer Strain across Different Stages of Heart Failure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05122793 ("HerzCheck" - Erkennung Und Prävention Einer Frühen Herzinsuffizienz Mittels Telemedizinischer Verfahren in Strukturschwachen Regionen), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
"HerzCheck" - Erkennung Und Prävention Einer Frühen Herzinsuffizienz Mittels Telemedizinischer Verfahren in Strukturschwachen Regionen
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Layer-specific fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance in suspected acute coronary syndrome: a prospective study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Reference Values for Myocardial Strain by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking: Insights From Healthy Volunteers and Heart Failure Patients Using Caas MR.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Call for a Precision Medicine Approach.JACC. Advances · 2026Review
- CMR-LGE imaging features of dilated cardiomyopathy and relationship with left ventricular function.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Exploring the association between tissue sodium content, heart failure subtypes, and symptom burden: insights from magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Layer-Specific Strain Analysis in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Reduced dynamic changes in pulmonary artery compliance during isometric handgrip exercise in patients with heart failure.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A simplified approach to discriminate between healthy subjects and patients with heart failure using cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial deformation imaging.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
- CMR-based cardiac phenotyping in different forms of heart failure.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Layer-specific fast strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance imaging aids in the identification and discrimination of acute myocardial injury: a prospective proof-of-concept study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Article
- Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary artery stiffness in heart failure patients via cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Integration of longitudinal and circumferential strain predicts volumetric change across the cardiac cycle and differentiates patients along the heart failure continuum.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Article
- The value of CMR Left ventricular strain analysis in evaluating ICM.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Reduced functional capacity is associated with the proportion of impaired myocardial deformation assessed in heart failure patients by CMR.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- State-of-the-art myocardial strain by CMR feature tracking: clinical applications and future perspectives.European radiology · 2022Review
- Layer-specific Strain Analysis with Cardiac MRI Feature Tracking in Acute Myocarditis.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2022Article
- CMR-derived myocardial strain analysis differentiates ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy-a propensity score-matched study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- CMR feature tracking strain patterns and their association with circulating cardiac biomarkers in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021Article
- The Potential of Oxygenation-Sensitive CMR in Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is associated with progressive ventricular remodeling and impaired contraction that affects distinctly various regions of the myocardium. Our study applied cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) to assess comparatively myocardial strain at 3 distinct levels: subendocardial (Endo-), mid (Myo-) and subepicardial (Epi-) myocardium across an extended spectrum of patients with HF. 59 patients with HF, divided into 3 subgroups as follows: preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, N = 18), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, N = 21), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, N = 20) and a group of age- gender- matched volunteers (N = 17) were included. Using CMR FT we assessed systolic longitudinal and circumferential strain and strain-rate at Endo-, Myo- and Epi- levels. Strain values were the highest in the Endo- layer and progressively lower in the Myo- and Epi- layers respectively, this gradient was present in all the patients groups analyzed but decreased progressively in HFmrEF and further on in HFrEF groups. GLS decreased with the severity of the disease in all 3 layers: Normal > HFpEF > HFmrEF > HFrEF (Endo-: -23.0 ± 3.5 > -20.0 ± 3.3 > -16.4 ± 2.2 > -11.0 ± 3.2, p < 0.001, Myo-: -20.7 ± 2.4 > -17.5.0 ± 2.6 > -14.5 ± 2.1 > -9.6 ± 2.7, p < 0.001; Epi-: -15.7 ± 1.9 > -12.2 ± 2.1 > -10.6 ± 2.3 > -7.7 ± 2.3, p < 0.001). In contrast, GCS was not different between the Normal and HFpEF (Endo-: -34.5 ± 6.2 vs -33.9 ± 5.7, p = 0.51; Myo-: -21.9 ± 3.8 vs -21.3 ± 2.2, p = 0.39, Epi-: -11.4 ± 2.0 vs -10.9 ± 2.3, p = 0.54) but was, as well, markedly lower in the systolic heart failure groups: Normal > HFmrEF > HFrEF (Endo-: -34.5 ± 6.2 > -20.0 ± 4.2 > 12.3 ± 4.2, p < 0.001; Myo-: -21.9 ± 3.8 > -13.0 ± 3.4 > -8.0 ± 2.7. p < 0.001; Epi-: -11.4 ± 2.0 > -7.9 ± 2.3 > -4.5 ± 1.9. p < 0.001). CMR feature tracking multilayer strain assessment identifies large range differences between distinct myocardial regions. Our data emphasizes the importance of sub-endocardial myocardium for cardiac contraction and thus, its predilect role in imaging detection of functional impairment. CMR feature tracking offers a convenient, readily available, platform to evaluate myocardial contraction with excellent spatial resolution, rendering further details about discrete areas of the myocardium. Using this technique across distinct groups of patients with heart failure (HF), we demonstrate that subendocardial regions of the myocardium exhibit much higher strain values than mid-myocardium or subepicardial and are more sensitive to detect contractile impairment. We also show comparatively higher values of circumferential strain compared with longitudinal and a higher sensitivity to detect contractile impairment. A newly characterized group of patients, HF with mid-range ejection fraction (EF), shows similar traits of decompensation but has relatively higher strain values as patients with HF with reduced EF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.