Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712592›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

High ellipticity reduces semi-circular canal sensitivity in squamates compared to mammals.

Jana Goyens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jana GoyensLaboratory of Functional Morphology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. jana.goyens@uantwerpen.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The semi-circular canals in the inner ear sense head rotations. It is widely recognised that the anatomy of the semi-circular canals is often adapted to the species-specific agility, in order to provide the necessary sensitivity. Based on research on mammals, the ellipticity of the semi-circular canal was so far considered as a non-important factor herein. A dataset of 125 squamate species and 156 mammalian species, now shows that the posterior semi-circular canal of squamates is much more elliptical (eccentricities ranging between 0.76 and 0.94) than that of mammals (eccentricities ranging between 0 and 0.71). Fluid-Structure Interaction computer models show that the effect of the ellipticity on sensitivity is strongest in small semi-circular canals. This new insight indicates that the high ellipticity in squamates leads to a severe reduction in sensitivity of up to 45%. In mammals, on the other hand, the reduction in sensitivity is limited to 13%, which is consistent with previous literature that found a limited effect of semi-circular canal ellipticity in mammals. Further, there is a strongly negative correlation between semi-circular canal size and eccentricity in squamates, which is absent in mammals. Hence, the smallest squamates have the most elliptical semi-circular canals. In general, the smaller the semi-circular canal, the less sensitive it is. Therefore, the highly elliptical squamate canals are probably the result of fitting the largest possible canal in small and flat head. Miniaturising the canals while maintaining a circular shape would reduce the sensitivity by another 73% compared to the highly elliptical canals.

Indexed as

LizardsMammalsModels, TheoreticalAlgorithmsAnimalsSemicircular CanalsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31712592
PMCPMC6848070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.