Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712560›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Postmenopausal Osteoporosis reference genes for qPCR expression assays.

Camilla Albertina Dantas de Lima, Suelen Cristina de Lima, Alexandre Domingues Barbosa, Paula Sandrin-Garcia, Will de Barros Pita, Jaqueline de Azevêdo Silva, Sergio Crovella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessment of Reference Genes Stability in Cortical Bone of Obese and Diabetic Mice.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camilla Albertina Dantas de LimaDepartment of Genetics - Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. da Engenharia, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50740-580, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0320-3674
Suelen Cristina de LimaLaboratory of Immunopathology Keizo Asami - Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Professor Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Alexandre Domingues BarbosaLaboratory of Immunopathology Keizo Asami - Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Professor Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Paula Sandrin-GarciaDepartment of Genetics - Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. da Engenharia, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50740-580, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Will de Barros PitaDepartment of Antibiotics - Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. dos Economistas, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 52171-011, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Jaqueline de Azevêdo SilvaDepartment of Genetics - Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. da Engenharia, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50740-580, Recife, PE, Brazil. Jaqueline.azevedo@ufpe.br.
Sergio CrovellaInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8493-1168
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis (OP) is a multifactorial disease influenced by genetic factors in more than half of the cases. In spite of the efforts to clarify the relationship among genetic factors and susceptibility to develop OP, many genetic associations need to be further functionally validated. Besides, some limitations as the choice of stably expressed reference genes (RG) should be overcome to ensure the quality and reproducibility of gene expression assays. To our knowledge, a validation study for RG in OP is still missing. We compared the expression levels, using polymerase chain reaction quantitative real time (qPCR) of 10 RG (G6PD, B2M, GUSB, HSP90, EF1A, RPLP0, GAPDH, ACTB, 18 S and HPRT1) to assess their suitability in OP analysis by using GeNorm, Normfinder, BestKeeper and RefFinder programs. A minimal number of two RG was recommended by GeNorm to obtain a reliable normalization. RPLP0 and B2M were identified as the most stable genes in OP studies while ACTB, 18 S and HPRT1 were inadequate for normalization in our data set. Moreover, we showed the dramatic effects of suboptimal RG choice on the quantification of a target gene, highlighting the importance in the identification of the most appropriate reference gene to specific diseases. We suggest the use of RPLP0 and B2M as the most stable reference genes while we do not recommend the use of the least stable reference genes HPRT1, 18 S and ACTB in OP expression assays using PBMC as biological source. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of individualized and careful choice in software and reference genes selection.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31712560
PMCPMC6848520
OpenAlexW2988904885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.