Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712357›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2019

Impact of brand drug discount cards on private insurer, government and patient expenditures.

Michael R Law, Fiona K I Chan, Mark Harrison, Heather C Worthington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Co-pay cards in Canada: Improving choice or institutionalizing bribes?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael R LawUBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health (Law, Chan, Worthington) and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Harrison), The University of British Columbia; Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (Harrison), St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC michael.law@ubc.ca.
Fiona K I ChanUBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health (Law, Chan, Worthington) and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Harrison), The University of British Columbia; Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (Harrison), St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
Mark HarrisonUBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health (Law, Chan, Worthington) and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Harrison), The University of British Columbia; Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (Harrison), St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
Heather C WorthingtonUBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health (Law, Chan, Worthington) and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Harrison), The University of British Columbia; Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (Harrison), St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrand discount cards have become a popular way for patients to reduce out-of-pocket spending on drugs; however, controversy exists over their potential to increase insurers' costs. We estimated the impact of brand discount cards on Canadian drug expenditures.

methodsUsing national claims-level pharmacy adjudication data, we performed a retrospective comparison of prescriptions filled using a brand discount card matched to equivalent generic prescriptions between September 2014 and September 2017. We investigated the impact on expenditures for 3 groups of prescriptions: those paid only through private insurance, those paid only through public insurance and those paid only out of pocket.

resultsWe studied 2.82 million prescriptions for 89 different medications for which brand discount cards were used. Use of discount cards resulted in 46% higher private insurance expenditures than comparable generic prescriptions (+$23.09 per prescription, 95% confidence interval [CI] $22.97 to $23.21). Public insurance expenditures were only slightly higher with cards: an increase of 1.3% or $0.37 per prescription (95% CI $0.33 to $0.41). Finally, out-of-pocket transactions using a card resulted in mean patient savings of 7% or $3.49 per prescription (95% CI -$3.55 to -$3.43). The impact varied widely among medicines across all 3 analyses.

interpretationThe use of brand discount cards increased costs to private insurers, had little impact on public insurers and resulted in mixed impacts for patients. These effects likely resulted from private insurers reimbursing brand drug prices even when generics were available and from discount cards being adjudicated after claims were sent to other insurers in most cases. Patients and their clinicians should recognize that discount cards have mixed impacts on out-of-pocket costs.

Indexed as

CanadaCosts and Cost AnalysisCost SavingsDrug CostsDrug IndustryDrug PrescriptionsDrugs, GenericFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesMaleMiddle AgedPrescription FeesRetrospective StudiesDrugs, Generic

Identifiers

PMID31712357
PMCPMC6861153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.