Observational studyBMJ open2019
Prehospital and in-hospital delays to care and associated factors in patients with STEMI: an observational study in 101 non-PCI hospitals in China.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01398228 (Clinical Pathways for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes - Phase 3), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Pathways for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes - Phase 3
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sex disparities in pre-hospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Acute myocardial infarction treatment delay in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Future cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Pre-Hospital Delay in STEMI: A Narrative Review of Symptom Onset-to-First Medical Contact Across High-Income and Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Clinical cardiology · 2026Review
- Persistent Sex Disparities in Pre-Hospital Delay Among Patients With STEMI Despite Overall Improvements: Findings From the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Chest Pain Center Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Nomogram for predicting acute kidney injury after primary PCI in STEMI patients: development and validation study.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Improving Door-to-ECG Time in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Closed-Loop Audit from a Tertiary Care Center in Peshawar.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Social and clinical vulnerability in stroke and STEMI management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a registry-based study.BMJ open · 2024Observational
- Gender disparities in the mediating role of symptom knowledge level in reducing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) decision delay: Findings from a community-based study in China.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Changes in process and outcome for ST elevation myocardial infarction in central China from 2011 to 2018.Chinese medical journal · 2023Observational
- Under the chest pain center mechanism, whether the nursing handover affects the nursing efficiency and the outcomes of patients with STEMI in the emergency department? A retrospective study.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of the outcomes of EMS vs. Non-EMS transport of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Southern Iran: a population-based study.BMC emergency medicine · 2022Article
- The role of late reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a real-world retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Yemeni Patients.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo describe the prehospital and in-hospital delays to care and factors associated with the delays among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in non-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) hospitals in China. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsWe analysed data from a large registry-based quality of care improvement trial conducted from 2011 to 2014 among 101 non-PCI hospitals in China. A total of 7312 patients with STEMI were included. Prehospital delay was defined as time from symptom onset to hospital arrival >120 min, first ECG delay as time from arrival to first ECG >10 min, thrombolytic therapy delay as time from first ECG to thrombolytic therapy >10 min and in-hospital delay as time from arrival to thrombolytic therapy >30 min. Logistic regressions with generalised estimating equations were preformed to identify the factors associated with each delay.
resultsThe rates of prehospital delay, first ECG delay, thrombolytic therapy delay and in-hospital delay were 67.1%, 31.4%, 85.8% and 67.8%, respectively. Patients who were female, older than 65 years old, illiterate, farmers, onset during late night and forenoon, had heart rate ≥100 beats/m at admission were more likely and patients who had history of myocardial infarction, hypertension or SBP <90 mm Hg at admission were less likely to have prehospital delay. First ECG delay was more likely to take place in patients arriving on regular hours. Thrombolytic therapy delay rate was lower in patients who had prehospital delay or first ECG delay but higher in those with heart rate ≥100 beats/m at admission. In-hospital delay rate was lower in patients with a history of dyslipidaemia and those who arrived during regular hours.
conclusionChinese patients with STEMI in low medical resource areas suffered severe prehospital and in-hospital delays to care. Future efforts should be made to improve the prehospital delay among vulnerable populations with low socioeconomic status. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01398228; Post-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.