Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712254›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2020

Topoisomerase II SUMOylation activates a metaphase checkpoint via Haspin and Aurora B kinases.

Nootan Pandey, Daniel Keifenheim, Makoto Michael Yoshida, Victoria A Hassebroek, Caitlin Soroka, Yoshiaki Azuma, Duncan J Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Histone H3 tail modifications required for meiosis inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. SUMO: A Swiss Army Knife for Eukaryotic Topoisomerases.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mitotic chromosomes.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nootan Pandey *Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Daniel Keifenheim *Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Makoto Michael YoshidaDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Victoria A HassebroekDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Caitlin SorokaDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Yoshiaki AzumaDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Duncan J ClarkeDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Funding

Control of Chromosome Segregation by DNA Topoisomerase IIR01GM130858 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DUNCAN J. CLARKE · 2019 to 2026
$2.2M
Maneuvering of Macrophage Function By Escherichia coli K1R01NS073115 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI NEMANI, PRASADARAO V · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Regulation of kinetochore function by Topoisomerase IIR01GM112793 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI AZUMA, YOSHIAKI, CLARKE, DUNCAN J. · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112793NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130858NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topoisomerase II (Topo II) is essential for mitosis since it resolves sister chromatid catenations. Topo II dysfunction promotes aneuploidy and drives cancer. To protect from aneuploidy, cells possess mechanisms to delay anaphase onset when Topo II is perturbed, providing additional time for decatenation. Molecular insight into this checkpoint is lacking. Here we present evidence that catalytic inhibition of Topo II, which activates the checkpoint, leads to SUMOylation of the Topo II C-terminal domain (CTD). This modification triggers mobilization of Aurora B kinase from inner centromeres to kinetochore proximal centromeres and the core of chromosome arms. Aurora B recruitment accompanies histone H3 threonine-3 phosphorylation and requires Haspin kinase. Strikingly, activation of the checkpoint depends both on Haspin and Aurora B. Moreover, mutation of the conserved CTD SUMOylation sites perturbs Aurora B recruitment and checkpoint activation. The data indicate that SUMOylated Topo II recruits Aurora B to ectopic sites, constituting the molecular trigger of the metaphase checkpoint when Topo II is catalytically inhibited.

Indexed as

MetaphaseMitosisSumoylationAurora Kinase BChromosome SegregationChromosomes, HumanDiketopiperazinesDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIHeLa CellsHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKinetochoresPhosphorylationPiperazinesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTopoisomerase II Inhibitors4,4'-(1,2-dimethyl-1,2-ethanediyl)bis-2,6-piperazinedioneAURKB protein, humanAurora Kinase BDiketopiperazinesDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIHASPIN protein, humanIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPiperazinesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTopoisomerase II Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31712254
PMCPMC7039214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.