Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31712209›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2020

Differences in the Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin between Oncology and Nononcology Pediatric Patients.

C C Llanos-Paez, C E Staatz, R Lawson, S Hennig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in acute lymphoblastic leukemia pediatric patients compared to non-oncology patients.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C C Llanos-PaezSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia c.llanospaez@uq.edu.au.
C E StaatzSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
R LawsonThe Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
S HennigSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dosing gentamicin in pediatric patients can be difficult due to its narrow therapeutic index. A significantly higher percentage of fat mass has been observed in children receiving oncology treatment than in those who are not. Differences in the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin between oncology and nononcology pediatric patients and individual dosage requirements were evaluated in this study, using normal fat mass (NFM) as a body size descriptor. Data from 423 oncology and 115 nononcology patients were analyzed. Differences in drug disposition were observed between the oncology and nononcology patients, with oncology patients having a 15% lower central volume of distribution and 32% lower intercompartmental clearance. Simulations based on the population pharmacokinetic model demonstrated low exposure target attainment in all individuals at the current clinical recommended starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg of body weight once daily, with 57.4% of oncology and 35.7% of nononcology subjects achieving a peak concentration (

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBody CompositionBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleGentamicinsHumansInfantInfectionsMaleNeoplasmsPediatricsAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicinsbody compositiongentamicinNONMEMnormal fat masspediatrics

Identifiers

PMID31712209
PMCPMC6985741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.