Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31711543›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2019

Natural language processing for disease phenotyping in UK primary care records for research: a pilot study in myocardial infarction and death.

Anoop D Shah, Emily Bailey, Tim Williams, Spiros Denaxas, Richard Dobson, Harry Hemingway

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anoop D ShahHealth Data Research UK London, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK. anoop@doctors.org.uk.
Emily BaileyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Tim WilliamsClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 10 South Colonnade, London, E14 4PU, UK.
Spiros DenaxasHealth Data Research UK London, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK.
Richard DobsonHealth Data Research UK London, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK.
Harry HemingwayHealth Data Research UK London, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK.
University College London · GBClinical Practice Research Datalink · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationChief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health RP-PG-0407-10314Medical Research Council K006584/1Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Wellcome Trust 086091/Z/08/ZWellcome Trust 0938/30/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFree text in electronic health records (EHR) may contain additional phenotypic information beyond structured (coded) information. For major health events - heart attack and death - there is a lack of studies evaluating the extent to which free text in the primary care record might add information. Our objectives were to describe the contribution of free text in primary care to the recording of information about myocardial infarction (MI), including subtype, left ventricular function, laboratory results and symptoms; and recording of cause of death. We used the CALIBER EHR research platform which contains primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) linked to hospital admission data, the MINAP registry of acute coronary syndromes and the death registry. In CALIBER we randomly selected 2000 patients with MI and 1800 deaths. We implemented a rule-based natural language engine, the Freetext Matching Algorithm, on site at CPRD to analyse free text in the primary care record without raw data being released to researchers. We analysed text recorded within 90 days before or 90 days after the MI, and on or after the date of death.

resultsWe extracted 10,927 diagnoses, 3658 test results, 3313 statements of negation, and 850 suspected diagnoses from the myocardial infarction patients. Inclusion of free text increased the recorded proportion of patients with chest pain in the week prior to MI from 19 to 27%, and differentiated between MI subtypes in a quarter more patients than structured data alone. Cause of death was incompletely recorded in primary care; in 36% the cause was in coded data and in 21% it was in free text. Only 47% of patients had exactly the same cause of death in primary care and the death registry, but this did not differ between coded and free text causes of death.

conclusionsAmong patients who suffer MI or die, unstructured free text in primary care records contains much information that is potentially useful for research such as symptoms, investigation results and specific diagnoses. Access to large scale unstructured data in electronic health records (millions of patients) might yield important insights.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingPhenotypeData MiningHumansMyocardial InfarctionPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareUnited KingdomChest painFree textMyocardial infarctionNatural language processingPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID31711543
PMCPMC6849160
OpenAlexW2986913023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.