Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31711540›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2019

Exploring semantic deep learning for building reliable and reusable one health knowledge from PubMed systematic reviews and veterinary clinical notes.

Mercedes Arguello-Casteleiro, Robert Stevens, Julio Des-Diz, Chris Wroe, Maria Jesus Fernandez-Prieto, Nava Maroto, Diego Maseda-Fernandez, George Demetriou, Simon Peters, Peter-John M Noble and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. One Digital Health for more FAIRness.Methods of information in medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mercedes Arguello-CasteleiroSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. m.arguello@manchester.ac.uk.
Robert StevensSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Julio Des-DizHospital do Salnés, Villagarcía de Arousa, Pontevedra, Spain.
Chris WroeBMJ, Tavistock Square, London, UK.
Maria Jesus Fernandez-PrietoSalford Languages, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Nava MarotoDepartamento de Lingüística Aplicada a la Ciencia y a la Tecnología, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Diego Maseda-FernandezMidcheshire Hospital Foundation Trust, NHS England, Crewe, UK.
George DemetriouSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Simon PetersSchool of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peter-John M NobleSmall Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Phil H JonesSmall Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jo Dukes-McEwanSmall Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alan D RadfordSmall Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
John KeaneSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Goran NenadicSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N019547/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/NO19547/1Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep Learning opens up opportunities for routinely scanning large bodies of biomedical literature and clinical narratives to represent the meaning of biomedical and clinical terms. However, the validation and integration of this knowledge on a scale requires cross checking with ground truths (i.e. evidence-based resources) that are unavailable in an actionable or computable form. In this paper we explore how to turn information about diagnoses, prognoses, therapies and other clinical concepts into computable knowledge using free-text data about human and animal health. We used a Semantic Deep Learning approach that combines the Semantic Web technologies and Deep Learning to acquire and validate knowledge about 11 well-known medical conditions mined from two sets of unstructured free-text data: 300 K PubMed Systematic Review articles (the PMSB dataset) and 2.5 M veterinary clinical notes (the VetCN dataset). For each target condition we obtained 20 related clinical concepts using two deep learning methods applied separately on the two datasets, resulting in 880 term pairs (target term, candidate term). Each concept, represented by an n-gram, is mapped to UMLS using MetaMap; we also developed a bespoke method for mapping short forms (e.g. abbreviations and acronyms). Existing ontologies were used to formally represent associations. We also create ontological modules and illustrate how the extracted knowledge can be queried. The evaluation was performed using the content within BMJ Best Practice.

resultsMetaMap achieves an F measure of 88% (precision 85%, recall 91%) when applied directly to the total of 613 unique candidate terms for the 880 term pairs. When the processing of short forms is included, MetaMap achieves an F measure of 94% (precision 92%, recall 96%). Validation of the term pairs with BMJ Best Practice yields precision between 98 and 99%.

conclusionsThe Semantic Deep Learning approach can transform neural embeddings built from unstructured free-text data into reliable and reusable One Health knowledge using ontologies and content from BMJ Best Practice.

Indexed as

Deep LearningKnowledge BasesOne HealthPubMedSemanticsSystematic Reviews as TopicVeterinariansBiological OntologiesHumansCBOWDeep learningModule extractionOne healthOntologyPubMedSemantic deep learningSkip-gramSNOMED CTVeterinary clinical narratives

Identifiers

PMID31711540
PMCPMC6849172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.