Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31711500›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

The Discharge Communication Study: research protocol for a mixed methods study to investigate and triangulate discharge communication experiences of patients, GPs, and hospital professionals, alongside a corresponding discharge letter sample.

Katharine Weetman, Jeremy Dale, Emma Scott, Stephanie Schnurr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharine WeetmanUnit of Academic Primary Care, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. K.Weetman@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0377-3933
Jeremy DaleUnit of Academic Primary Care, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Emma ScottUnit of Academic Primary Care, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Stephanie SchnurrCentre for Applied Linguistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

CCGs of Coventry and Rugby and South Warwickshire N/AEconomic and Social Research Council ES/J500203/1UK research and innovation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDischarge letters are crucial during care transitions from hospital to home. Research indicates a need for improvement to increase quality of care and decrease adverse outcomes. These letters are often sent from the hospital discharging physician to the referring clinician, typically the patient's General Practitioner (GP) in the UK, and patients may or may not be copied into them. Relatively little is known about the barriers and enablers to sending patients discharge letters. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate from GP, hospital professional (HP) and patient perspectives how to improve processes of patients receiving letters and increase quality of discharge letters. The study has a particular focus on the impacts of receiving or not receiving letters on patient experiences and quality of care.

methodsThe setting was a region in the West Midlands of England, UK. The research aimed to recruit a minimum of 30 GPs, 30 patients and 30 HPs in order to capture 90 experiences of discharge communication. Participating GPs initially screened and selected a range of recent discharge letters which they assessed to be successful and unsuccessful exemplars. These letters identified potential participants who were invited to take part: the HP letter writer, GP recipient and patient. Participant viewpoints are collected through interviews, focus groups and surveys and will be "matched" to the discharge letter sample, so forming multiple-perspective "quartet" cases. These "quartets" allow direct comparisons between different discharge experiences within the same communicative event. The methods for analysis draw on techniques from the fields of Applied Linguistics and Health Sciences, including: corpus linguistics; inferential statistics; content analysis. DISCUSSION: This mixed-methods study is novel in attempting to triangulate views of patients, GPs and HPs in relation to specific discharge letters. Patient and practitioner involvement will inform design decisions and interpretation of findings. Recommendations for improving discharge letters and the process of patients receiving letters will be made, with the intention of informing guidelines on discharge communication. Ethics approval was granted in July 2017 by the UK Health Research Authority. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, reports and newsletters, and presentations.

Indexed as

CommunicationAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical ProtocolsContinuity of Patient CareEnglandGeneral PractitionersHospitalsHumansInterprofessional RelationsMedical RecordsMedical Staff, HospitalPatient DischargePatient SatisfactionPatient TransferPersonal SatisfactionResearch DesignCommunicationContinuity of careDischarge letterHospital dischargeMixed methods

Identifiers

PMID31711500
PMCPMC6849198
OpenAlexW2984927247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.