ArticleBMC medical genomics2019
Accurate detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancers by bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Occurrence of Biomarker Mutation in Colorectal Cancer among the Asian Population.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Sequential CRISPR-EspCas9-Mediated Wild-Type Depletion Enhances the Detection Sensitivity of Rare Mutations for Canine Liquid Biopsy Application.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Simulation analysis of EGFR mutation detection: Oncomine Dx target test and AmoyDx panel impact on lung cancer treatment decisions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Whole‑exome sequencing reveals Lewis lung carcinoma is a hypermutated Kras/Nras-mutant cancer with extensive regional mutation clusters in its genome.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Rescue of Low-Yield DNA Samples for Next-Generation Sequencing Using Vacuum Centrifugal Concentration in a Clinical Workflow.Reports (MDPI) · 2023Article
- An innovative single-base extension method for synchronous detection of point mutations and MSI status in colorectal cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Simple IHC reveals complex MMR alternations than PCR assays: Validation by LCM and next-generation sequencing.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Cationic copolymers that enhance wild-type-specific suppression in BNA-clamp PCR and preferentially increase theBiology methods & protocols · 2022Article
- Allele-Specific PCR forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Effect ofOncology letters · 2020Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study for Evaluation of KRAS and BRAF Mutations by Reverse Dot Blot, PCR-RFLP, and Allele-Specific PCR Methods Among Patients with Colorectal Cancer.Avicenna journal of medical biotechnologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with metastatic colorectal cancer can benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. However, colorectal cancers harboring constitutive activating mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes are not responsive to anti-EGFR therapy. To select patients for appropriate treatment, genetic testing of these three genes is routinely performed.
methodsWe applied bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR (BNA-clamp PCR) to detect somatic hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. PCR products from BNA-clamp PCR were subsequently analyzed Sanger sequencing. We then compared results with those from the PCR-reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe (PCR-rSSO) method, which has been used as in vitro diagnostic test in Japan. To validate the mutation status, we also performed next generation sequencing using all samples.
resultsIn 50 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, KRAS mutations were detected at frequencies of 50% (25/50) and 52% (26/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively, and NRAS mutations were detected at 12% (6/50) and 12% (6/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively. The concordance rate for detection of KRAS and NRAS mutations between the two was 94% (47/50). However, there were three discordant results. We validated these three discordant and 47 concordant results by next generation sequencing. All mutations identified by BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing were also identified by next generation sequencing. BNA-clamp PCR detected BRAF mutations in 6% (3/50) of tumor samples.
conclusionsOur results indicate that BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing detects somatic mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.