Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31711469›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Impact of health education intervention on knowledge and perception of cervical cancer and screening for women in Ghana.

Nancy Innocentia Ebu, Salome Amissah-Essel, Christiana Asiedu, Selorm Akaba, Kingsley Asare Pereko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Kin KeeperJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Health system constraints in cervical cancer prevention in rural Namibia: A qualitative study.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nancy Innocentia EbuDepartment of Adult Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3279-5800
Salome Amissah-EsselDepartment of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, Faculty of Science and Technology Education, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Christiana AsieduDepartment of Adult Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Selorm AkabaDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Extension, School of Agriculture, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Kingsley Asare PerekoDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Funding

University of Cape Coast, Directorate of Research, Innovation and Consultancy DRIC/R/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden of cervical cancer continues to rise in developing economies. Women in the sub-Saharan African region have higher chances of developing cervical cancer due to a greater prevalence of related risk factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of health education intervention on cervical cancer and screening perceptions of women in the Komenda, Edina, Eguafo, and Abirem (K.E.E.A) District in the Central Region of Ghana.

methodsA non-equivalent control-group design was used to select church women; 396 in the intervention group and 386 in the control group, aged 11 to 70 years in the K.E.E.A District in the Central Region of Ghana. Data was collected via a validated structured interview schedule and analysed using the paired - and independent-samples t-tests, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U test.

resultsA comparison of the mean differences between the pre-post-test scores for the intervention and control groups showed a statistically significant difference for knowledge of cervical cancer (t = 6.22, df = 780, p = 0.001), knowledge of cervical cancer screening (t = 5.96, df = 780, p = 0.001), perceived seriousness (t = 3.36, df = 780, p = 0.001), perceived benefits (t = 9.19, df = 780, p = 0.001), and perceived barriers (t = 3.19, df = 780, p = 0.001). However, perceived susceptibility for the intervention group reduced, evidenced by a decrease in the mean (mean = - 0.12) compared to the control group (mean = 0.93) and this was statistically significant (t = 2.72, df = 780, p = 0.007).

conclusionsHealth education interventions are critical in improving knowledge and perceptions, and increasing self-efficacy of women about cervical cancer and screening.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGhanaHealth EducationHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultCervical cancerDate: 22/03.2019.Education interventionHealth belief modelKnowledgePre-post-test, Ghana.Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13468193.Trial registry: ISRCTN Registry.Women

Identifiers

PMID31711469
PMCPMC6849238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.