ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2020
Compassionate End-of-Life Care: Mixed-Methods Multisite Evaluation of the 3 Wishes Project.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Compassionate End of Life Care in the ICU: Evaluating the Value, Transferability, Affordability, and Sustainability and Value of the 3 Wishes Project
Effect of the 3 Wishes Program on Bereaved Families' End-of-Life Care Perceptions
Personalized End of Life Care in Safety-Net Hospitals: Implementation of the 3 Wishes Project
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- How should we evaluate the impact and implementation of palliative care education programs? The Pallium Canada experience.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Interventions for family involvement enhance end-of-life care for hospitalized patients: an integrative review.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Handcrafting Joy to Support Both the Patient and Clinician Experience.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Potentially Identifying Variables Reported in 100 Qualitative Health Research Articles: Implications for Data Sharing and Secondary Analysis.Forum, qualitative social research · 2023Article
- Enhancing end of life care on general internal medical wards: the 3 Wishes Project.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Drivers and drainers of compassion in intensive care medicine: An empirical study using video vignettes.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- End-of-Life Care During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: The 3 Wishes Program.Critical care explorations · 2021Article
- The mental health crises of the families of COVID-19 victims: a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Clinician Perspectives on Caring for Dying Patients During the Pandemic : A Mixed-Methods Study.Annals of internal medicine · 2021Article
- Scale-up and sustainability of a personalized end-of-life care intervention: a longitudinal mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Experiences of Bereaved Family Members Receiving Commemorative Paintings: A Qualitative Study.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Principles Guiding Nonpandemic Critical Care Research During a Pandemic.Critical care medicine · 2020Review
- Recognizing a Patient Is Acutely Dying.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020Article
- Expanding the 3 Wishes Project for compassionate end-of-life care: a qualitative evaluation of local adaptations.BMC palliative care · 2020Article
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Considerations for the Frail Patient.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2020Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The 3 Wishes Project (3WP) is an end-of-life program that aims to honor the dignity of dying patients by creating meaningful patient- and family-centered memories while promoting humanistic interprofessional care. Objective: To determine whether this palliative intervention could be successfully implemented-defined as demonstrating value, transferability, affordability, and sustainability-beyond the intensive care unit in which it was created. Design: Mixed-methods formative program evaluation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04147169). Setting: 4 North American intensive care units. Participants: Dying patients, their families, clinicians, hospital managers, and administrators. Intervention: Wishes from dying patients, family members, and clinicians were elicited and implemented. Measurements: Patient characteristics and processes of care; the number, type, and cost of each wish; and semistructured interviews and focus groups with family members, clinicians, and managers. Results: A total of 730 patients were enrolled, and 3407 wishes were elicited. Qualitative data were gathered from 75 family members, 72 clinicians, and 20 managers or hospital administrators. Value included intentional comforting of families as they honored the lives and legacies of their loved ones while inspiring compassionate clinical care. Factors promoting transferability included family appreciation and a collaborative intensive care unit culture committed to dignity-conserving end-of-life care. Staff participation evolved from passive support to professional agency. Program initiation required minimal investment for reusable materials; thereafter, the mean cost was $5.19 (SD, $17.14) per wish. Sustainability was demonstrated by the continuation of 3WP at each site after study completion. Limitation: This descriptive formative evaluation describes tertiary care center-specific experiences rather than aiming for generalizability to all jurisdictions. Conclusion: The 3WP is a transferrable, affordable, and sustainable program that provides value to dying patients, their families, clinicians, and institutions. Primary Funding Source: Greenwall Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31711111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.