Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31711111›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2020

Compassionate End-of-Life Care: Mixed-Methods Multisite Evaluation of the 3 Wishes Project.

Meredith Vanstone, Thanh H Neville, France J Clarke, Marilyn Swinton, Marina Sadik, Alyson Takaoka, Orla Smith, Andrew J Baker, Allana LeBlanc, Denise Foster and 9 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04147169 completednot on this map

Compassionate End of Life Care in the ICU: Evaluating the Value, Transferability, Affordability, and Sustainability and Value of the 3 Wishes Project

TypeobservationalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled730ConditionsDeath, Communication, Multidisciplinary, Empathy, CompassionArmsFocused end-of-life conversations to promote connections among patients, family members and clinicians.
NCT05128799 completednot on this map

Effect of the 3 Wishes Program on Bereaved Families' End-of-Life Care Perceptions

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2019 to 2021Enrolled314ConditionsEnd of Life, DeathArms3 Wishes Program (3WP)
NCT06277310 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Personalized End of Life Care in Safety-Net Hospitals: Implementation of the 3 Wishes Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2024 to 2028Enrolled900ConditionsEnd of LifeArms3 Wishes Project
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recognizing a Patient Is Acutely Dying.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Meredith VanstoneMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (M.V., F.J.C., M.S., M.S., A.T., D.H.).
Thanh H NevilleUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (T.H.N., P.P., X.(.X., Y.K.).
France J ClarkeMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (M.V., F.J.C., M.S., M.S., A.T., D.H.).
Marilyn SwintonMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (M.V., F.J.C., M.S., M.S., A.T., D.H.).
Marina SadikMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (M.V., F.J.C., M.S., M.S., A.T., D.H.).
Alyson TakaokaMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (M.V., F.J.C., M.S., M.S., A.T., D.H.).
Orla SmithSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (O.S., A.J.B.).
Andrew J BakerSt. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (O.S., A.J.B.).
Allana LeBlancVancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (A.L.).
Denise FosterUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (D.F., V.D.).
Vinay DhingraUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (D.F., V.D.).
Peter PhungUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (T.H.N., P.P., X.(.X., Y.K.).
Xueqing Sherry XuUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (T.H.N., P.P., X.(.X., Y.K.).
Yuhan KaoUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (T.H.N., P.P., X.(.X., Y.K.).
Diane Heels-AnsdellMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (M.V., F.J.C., M.S., M.S., A.T., D.H.).
Benjamin TamNiagara Health, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada (B.T.).
Feli ToledoSt. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (F.T.).
Anne BoyleMcMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (A.B., D.J.C.).
Deborah J CookMcMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (A.B., D.J.C.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The 3 Wishes Project (3WP) is an end-of-life program that aims to honor the dignity of dying patients by creating meaningful patient- and family-centered memories while promoting humanistic interprofessional care. Objective: To determine whether this palliative intervention could be successfully implemented-defined as demonstrating value, transferability, affordability, and sustainability-beyond the intensive care unit in which it was created. Design: Mixed-methods formative program evaluation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04147169). Setting: 4 North American intensive care units. Participants: Dying patients, their families, clinicians, hospital managers, and administrators. Intervention: Wishes from dying patients, family members, and clinicians were elicited and implemented. Measurements: Patient characteristics and processes of care; the number, type, and cost of each wish; and semistructured interviews and focus groups with family members, clinicians, and managers. Results: A total of 730 patients were enrolled, and 3407 wishes were elicited. Qualitative data were gathered from 75 family members, 72 clinicians, and 20 managers or hospital administrators. Value included intentional comforting of families as they honored the lives and legacies of their loved ones while inspiring compassionate clinical care. Factors promoting transferability included family appreciation and a collaborative intensive care unit culture committed to dignity-conserving end-of-life care. Staff participation evolved from passive support to professional agency. Program initiation required minimal investment for reusable materials; thereafter, the mean cost was $5.19 (SD, $17.14) per wish. Sustainability was demonstrated by the continuation of 3WP at each site after study completion. Limitation: This descriptive formative evaluation describes tertiary care center-specific experiences rather than aiming for generalizability to all jurisdictions. Conclusion: The 3WP is a transferrable, affordable, and sustainable program that provides value to dying patients, their families, clinicians, and institutions. Primary Funding Source: Greenwall Foundation.

Indexed as

EmpathyTerminal CareFamilyFemaleFocus GroupsHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedProgram DevelopmentProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID31711111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.