Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31710971›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of food microbiology2020

Prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in African food animals and meat: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kate M Thomas, William A de Glanville, Gary C Barker, Jackie Benschop, Joram J Buza, Sarah Cleaveland, Margaret A Davis, Nigel P French, Blandina T Mmbaga, Gerard Prinsen and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of food microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella spp. from broiler chickens in Northern Algeria.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An Epidemiological Study onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  19. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kate M ThomasCentre for International Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Good Samaritan Foundation, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania. Electronic address: k.thomas@otago.ac.nz.
William A de GlanvilleInstitute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Gary C BarkerNorwich, United Kingdom.
Jackie BenschopmEpiLab, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Joram J BuzaSchool of Life Sciences and Bio-Engineering, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, United Republic of Tanzania.
Sarah CleavelandInstitute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Margaret A DavisPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States of America.
Nigel P FrenchmEpiLab, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; New Zealand Food Safety Science and Research Centre, New Zealand.
Blandina T MmbagaKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Good Samaritan Foundation, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania.
Gerard PrinsenSchool of People, Environment and Planning, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Emmanuel S SwaiState Department of Veterinary Services, Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania.
Ruth N ZadoksInstitute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
John A CrumpCentre for International Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L018926/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCampylobacter and Salmonella, particularly non-typhoidal Salmonella, are important bacterial enteric pathogens of humans which are often carried asymptomatically in animal reservoirs. Bacterial foodborne infections, including those derived from meat, are associated with illness and death globally but the burden is disproportionately high in Africa. Commercial meat production is increasing and intensifying in many African countries, creating opportunities and threats for food safety.

methodsFollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched six databases for English language studies published through June 2016, that reported Campylobacter or Salmonella carriage or infection prevalence in food animals and contamination prevalence in food animal products from African countries. A random effects meta-analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to estimate the species-specific prevalence of Salmonella and Campylobacter and assess relationships between sample type and region and the detection or isolation of either pathogen.

resultsSeventy-three studies reporting Campylobacter and 187 studies reporting Salmonella across 27 African countries were represented. Adjusted prevalence calculations estimate Campylobacter detection in 37.7% (95% CI 31.6-44.3) of 11,828 poultry samples; 24.6% (95% CI 18.0-32.7) of 1975 pig samples; 17.8% (95% CI 12.6-24.5) of 2907 goat samples; 12.6% (95% CI 8.4-18.5) of 2382 sheep samples; and 12.3% (95% CI 9.5-15.8) of 6545 cattle samples. Salmonella were detected in 13.9% (95% CI 11.7-16.4) of 25,430 poultry samples; 13.1% (95% CI 9.3-18.3) of 5467 pig samples; 9.3% (95% CI 7.2-12.1) of 2988 camel samples; 5.3% (95% CI 4.0-6.8) of 72,292 cattle samples; 4.8% (95% CI 3.6-6.3) of 11,335 sheep samples; and 3.4% (95% CI 2.2-5.2) of 4904 goat samples. 'External' samples (e.g. hide, feathers) were significantly more likely to be contaminated by both pathogens than 'gut' (e.g. faeces, cloaca) while meat and organs were significantly less likely to be contaminated than gut samples.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated widespread prevalence of Campylobacter species and Salmonella serovars in African food animals and meat, particularly in samples of poultry and pig origin. Source attribution studies could help ascertain which food animals are contributing to human campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis and direct potential food safety interventions.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCattleFecesFood ContaminationFood MicrobiologyHumansMeatMeat ProductsPoultryPrevalenceSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalSheepAfricaCampylobacterFood animalsFood safetyPrevalenceSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID31710971
PMCPMC6985902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.