ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2020
Developing Children's Oral Health Assessment Toolkits Using Machine Learning Algorithm.
Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mathematical and AI-Based Predictive Modelling for Dental Caries Risk Using Clinical and Behavioural Parameters.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Overview. Part 1: Fundamentals of AI, and its Contemporary Applications in Dentistry.International dental journal · 2025Review
- Article
- The Use of Audiovisual Distraction Tools in the Dental Setting for Pediatric Subjects with Special Healthcare Needs: A Review and Proposal of a Multi-Session Model for Behavioral Management.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- The Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Pedodontics: A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult and Pediatric Dentistry: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Utilization of machine learning models in predicting caries risk groups and oral health-related risk factors in adults.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Article
- Association between oral health-related behaviors and quality of life of adolescents among three provinces in Northwest China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- An overview of artificial intelligence based automated diagnosis in paediatric dentistry.Frontiers in oral health · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Its Uses and Application in Pediatric Dentistry: A Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Machine Learning in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Guardians' Self-Reported Fair/Poor Oral Health Is Associated with Their Young Children's Fair/Poor Oral Health and Clinically Determined Dental Caries Experience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Neural network system for analyzing statistical factors of patients for predicting the survival of dental implants.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Using a Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict the Likelihood of Presence of Dental Caries among Children Aged 2 to 7.Dentistry journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEvaluating children's oral health status and treatment needs is challenging. We aim to build oral health assessment toolkits to predict Children's Oral Health Status Index (COHSI) score and referral for treatment needs (RFTN) of oral health. Parent and Child toolkits consist of short-form survey items (12 for children and 8 for parents) with and without children's demographic information (7 questions) to predict the child's oral health status and need for treatment.
methodsData were collected from 12 dental practices in Los Angeles County from 2015 to 2016. We predicted COHSI score and RFTN using random Bootstrap samples with manually introduced Gaussian noise together with machine learning algorithms, such as Extreme Gradient Boosting and Naive Bayesian algorithms (using R). The toolkits predicted the probability of treatment needs and the COHSI score with percentile (ranking). The performance of the toolkits was evaluated internally and externally by residual mean square error (RMSE), correlation, sensitivity and specificity.
resultsThe toolkits were developed based on survey responses from 545 families with children aged 2 to 17 y. The sensitivity and specificity for predicting RFTN were 93% and 49% respectively with the external data. The correlation(s) between predicted and clinically determined COHSI was 0.88 (and 0.91 for its percentile). The RMSEs of the COHSI toolkit were 4.2 for COHSI (and 1.3 for its percentile).
conclusionsSurvey responses from children and their parents/guardians are predictive for clinical outcomes. The toolkits can be used by oral health programs at baseline among school populations. The toolkits can also be used to quantify differences between pre- and post-dental care program implementation. The toolkits' predicted oral health scores can be used to stratify samples in oral health research. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: This study creates the oral health toolkits that combine self- and proxy- reported short forms with children's demographic characteristics to predict children's oral health and treatment needs using Machine Learning algorithms. The toolkits can be used by oral health programs at baseline among school populations to quantify differences between pre and post dental care program implementation. The toolkits can also be used to stratify samples according to the treatment needs and oral health status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.