Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31710678›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Reprogramming of Retrotransposon Activity during Speciation of the Genus Citrus.

Carles Borredá, Estela Pérez-Román, Victoria Ibanez, Javier Terol, Manuel Talon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural and Evolutionary Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Exploring Genetic Diversity and Inter-/Intraspecific Polymorphism inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carles BorredáCentro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Valencia, Spain.
Estela Pérez-RománCentro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Valencia, Spain.
Victoria IbanezCentro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Valencia, Spain.
Javier TerolCentro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Valencia, Spain.
Manuel TalonCentro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Valencia, Spain.
Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speciation of the genus Citrus from a common ancestor has recently been established to begin ∼8 Ma during the late Miocene, a period of major climatic alterations. Here, we report the changes in activity of Citrus LTR retrotransposons during the process of diversification that gave rise to the current Citrus species. To reach this goal, we analyzed four pure species that diverged early during Citrus speciation, three recent admixtures derived from those species and an outgroup of the Citrus clade. More than 30,000 retrotransposons were grouped in ten linages. Estimations of LTR insertion times revealed that retrotransposon activity followed a species-specific pattern of change that could be ascribed to one of three different models. In some genomes, the expected pattern of gradual transposon accumulation was suddenly arrested during the radiation of the ancestor that gave birth to the current Citrus species. The individualized analyses of retrotransposon lineages showed that in each and every species studied, not all lineages follow the general pattern of the species itself. For instance, in most of the genomes, the retrotransposon activity of elements from the SIRE lineage reached its highest level just before Citrus speciation, while for Retrofit elements, it has been steadily growing. Based on these observations, we propose that Citrus retrotransposons may respond to stressful conditions driving speciation as a part of the genetic response involved in adaptation. This proposal implies that the evolving conditions of each species interact with the internal regulatory mechanisms of the genome controlling the proliferation of mobile elements.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationCitrusEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantModels, GeneticPhylogenyRetroelementsSpecies SpecificityTerminal Repeat SequencesRetroelementsgenomic evolutioninsertion timeLTR retrotransposonspeciationstructural variations

Identifiers

PMID31710678
PMCPMC7145672
OpenAlexW2987559184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.