Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31710673›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular research2020

Pathophysiology and diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Lara S F Konijnenberg, Peter Damman, Dirk J Duncker, Robert A Kloner, Robin Nijveldt, Robert-Jan M van Geuns, Colin Berry, Niels P Riksen, Javier Escaned, Niels van Royen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lara S F KonijnenbergDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter DammanDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dirk J DunckerDepartment of Radiology and Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert A KlonerHuntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Robin NijveldtDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robert-Jan M van GeunsDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Colin BerryWest of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.
Niels P RiksenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Javier EscanedDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos IDISSC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Niels van RoyenDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/11/2/2874British Heart Foundation RE/18/6134217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early mechanical reperfusion of the epicardial coronary artery by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the guideline-recommended treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Successful restoration of epicardial coronary blood flow can be achieved in over 95% of PCI procedures. However, despite angiographically complete epicardial coronary artery patency, in about half of the patients perfusion to the distal coronary microvasculature is not fully restored, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The exact pathophysiological mechanism of post-ischaemic coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is still debated. Therefore, the current review discusses invasive and non-invasive techniques for the diagnosis and quantification of CMD in STEMI in the clinical setting as well as results from experimental in vitro and in vivo models focusing on ischaemic-, reperfusion-, and inflammatory damage to the coronary microvascular endothelial cells. Finally, we discuss future opportunities to prevent or treat CMD in STEMI patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCardiac Imaging TechniquesCoronary CirculationMicrocirculationAnimalsCoronary VesselsHumansMicrovesselsNo-Reflow PhenomenonPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTreatment OutcomeCoronary microvascular dysfunctionCoronary microvascular endothelial cellsIntramyocardial haemorrhageMicrovascular reperfusion injuryST-elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID31710673
PMCPMC7061278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.