Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31710620›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Prevention of suicidal behaviour: Results of a controlled community-based intervention study in four European countries.

Ulrich Hegerl, Margaret Maxwell, Fiona Harris, Nicole Koburger, Roland Mergl, András Székely, Ella Arensman, Chantal Van Audenhove, Celine Larkin, Mónika Ditta Toth and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effectiveness of a communal, multilevel, interdisciplinary suicide prevention program.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ulrich HegerlDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3039-7470
Margaret MaxwellNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-9500
Fiona HarrisNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Nicole KoburgerDepartment of Research Services, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxonia, Germany.
Roland MerglDepartment of Psychology, Bundeswehr University Munich.
András SzékelyInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Ella ArensmanNational Suicide Research Foundation and School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Chantal Van AudenhoveCenter for care research and consultancy at KU Leuven (LUCAS), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Celine LarkinNational Suicide Research Foundation and School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Mónika Ditta TothInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Sónia QuintãoCEDOC, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Airi VärnikEstonian-Swedish Mental Health and Suicidology Institute (ERSI), Tallinn, Estonia & Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.
Axel GenzDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Saxonia-Anhalt, Germany.
Marco SarchiaponeDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
David McDaidLondon School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
Armin SchmidtkeDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5719-9856
György PureblInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
James C CoynePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Ricardo GusmãoCEDOC, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6334-4607
OSPI-Europe Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'European Alliance Against Depression' community-based intervention approach simultaneously targets depression and suicidal behaviour by a multifaceted community based intervention and has been implemented in more than 115 regions worldwide. The two main aims of the European Union funded project "Optimizing Suicide Prevention Programmes and Their Implementation in Europe" were to optimise this approach and to evaluate its implementation and impact. This paper reports on the primary outcome of the intervention (the number of completed and attempted suicides combined as 'suicidal acts') and on results concerning process evaluation analysis. Interventions were implemented in four European cities in Germany, Hungary, Portugal and Ireland, with matched control sites. The intervention comprised activities with predefined minimal intensity at four levels: training of primary care providers, a public awareness campaign, training of community facilitators, support for patients and their relatives. Changes in frequency of suicidal acts with respect to a one-year baseline in the four intervention regions were compared to those in the four control regions (chi-square tests). The decrease in suicidal acts compared to baseline in the intervention regions (-58 cases, -3.26%) did not differ significantly (χ2 = 0.13; p = 0.72) from the decrease in the control regions (-18 cases, -1.40%). However, intervention effects differed between countries (χ2 = 8.59; p = 0.04), with significant effects on suicidal acts in Portugal (χ2 = 4.82; p = 0.03). The interviews and observations explored local circumstances in each site throughout the study. Hypothesised mechanisms of action for successful implementation were observed and drivers for 'added-value' were identified: local partnership working and 'in-kind' contributions; an approach which valued existing partnership strengths; and synergies operating across intervention levels. It can be assumed that significant events during the implementation phase had a certain impact on the observed outcomes. However, this impact was, of course, not proven.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesSuicide PreventionFemaleGermanyHumansHungaryIrelandMalePortugalResearch DesignSuicide, AttemptedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31710620
PMCPMC6844461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.