Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31710601›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2019

Oxygen systems to improve clinical care and outcomes for children and neonates: A stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial in Nigeria.

Hamish R Graham, Ayobami A Bakare, Adejumoke I Ayede, Amy Z Gray, Barbara McPake, David Peel, Olatayo Olatinwo, Oladapo B Oyewole, Eleanor F G Neal, Cattram D Nguyen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Pricing Policy for Medical Oxygen and Potential Savings.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Hamish R GrahamCentre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, MCRI, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2461-0463
Ayobami A BakareDepartment of Paediatrics, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-2456-7899
Adejumoke I AyedeDepartment of Paediatrics, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Amy Z GrayCentre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, MCRI, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0127-0769
Barbara McPakeNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9904-1077
David PeelAshdown Consultants, Hartfield, England.
Olatayo OlatinwoBiomedical Services, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Oladapo B OyewoleDepartment of Paediatrics, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Eleanor F G NealCentre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, MCRI, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-0942
Cattram D NguyenClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, MCRI, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0599-8645
Shamim A QaziDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9688-9259
Rasa IzadnegahdarBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
John B CarlinClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, MCRI, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Adegoke G FaladeDepartment of Paediatrics, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Trevor DukeCentre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, MCRI, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4637-1416
Royal Children's Hospital · AUUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan · NGUniversity of Ibadan · NGGates Foundation · USThe University of Melbourne · AUWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving oxygen systems may improve clinical outcomes for hospitalised children with acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI). This paper reports the effects of an improved oxygen system on mortality and clinical practices in 12 general, paediatric, and maternity hospitals in southwest Nigeria. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted an unblinded stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial comparing three study periods: baseline (usual care), pulse oximetry introduction, and stepped introduction of a multifaceted oxygen system. We collected data from clinical records of all admitted neonates (<28 days old) and children (28 days to 14 years old). Primary analysis compared the full oxygen system period to the pulse oximetry period and evaluated odds of death for children, children with ALRI, neonates, and preterm neonates using mixed-effects logistic regression. Secondary analyses included the baseline period (enabling evaluation of pulse oximetry introduction) and evaluated mortality and practice outcomes on additional subgroups. Three hospitals received the oxygen system intervention at 4-month intervals. Primary analysis included 7,716 neonates and 17,143 children admitted during the 2-year stepped crossover period (November 2015 to October 2017). Compared to the pulse oximetry period, the full oxygen system had no association with death for children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.46; p = 0.721) or children with ALRI (aOR 1.09; 95% CI 0.50-2.41; p = 0.824) and was associated with an increased risk of death for neonates overall (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.04-2.00; p = 0.026) but not preterm/low-birth-weight neonates (aOR 1.30; 95% CI 0.76-2.23; p = 0.366). Secondary analyses suggested that the introduction of pulse oximetry improved oxygen practices prior to implementation of the full oxygen system and was associated with lower odds of death for children with ALRI (aOR 0.33; 95% CI 0.12-0.92; p = 0.035) but not for children, preterm neonates, or neonates overall (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.60-1.58, p = 0.913; aOR 1.12, 95% CI 0.56-2.26, p = 0.762; aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.57-1.43, p = 0.651). Limitations of our study are a lower-than-anticipated power to detect change in mortality outcomes (low event rates, low participant numbers, high intracluster correlation) and major contextual changes related to the 2016-2017 Nigerian economic recession that influenced care-seeking and hospital function during the study period, potentially confounding mortality outcomes.

conclusionsWe observed no mortality benefit for children and a possible higher risk of neonatal death following the introduction of a multifaceted oxygen system compared to introducing pulse oximetry alone. Where some oxygen is available, pulse oximetry may improve oxygen usage and clinical outcomes for children with ALRI.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000341325.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisCross-Over StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNigeriaOdds RatioOximetryOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyOxygen

Identifiers

PMID31710601
PMCPMC6844455
OpenAlexW2987742324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.