Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31709742›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

The prevalence and prognostic value of KRAS co-mutation subtypes in Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Dongjing Cai, Chengping Hu, Li Li, Shichao Deng, Jing Yang, Han Han-Zhang, Min Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Prognostic Role ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Molecular Characteristics and the Effect ofOncoTargets and therapy · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dongjing CaiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1107-4243
Chengping HuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1285-8579
Li LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3380-9159
Shichao DengDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4895-165X
Jing YangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7180-5197
Han Han-ZhangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou International Biotech Island, Guangzhou, China.
Min LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3578-2239
Central South University · CNBurning Rock Biotech (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveKRAS mutation plays a critical role in the initiation and development of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). KRAS-mutant patients exhibit diverse response to chemotherapy. KRAS co-mutation subtypes and their prognosis value in advanced Chinese NSCLC patients remain largely elusive.

methodsA total of 1126 Chinese advanced NSCLC patients from Xiangya hospital were screened by capture-based ultra-deep sequencing for KRAS mutation between January 2015 and December 2016. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

resultsAmong the patients screened, 84 cases were detected with KRAS mutation (7.5%). All of them were non-squamous NSCLC and received pemetrexed plus platinum as the first-line treatment. The most frequent KRAS co-mutation genes were TP53 (29%), TP53/LKB1 (19%), and LKB1 (14%). Our data revealed that patients with KRAS co-mutation had poorer prognosis in comparison with those harboring single KRAS mutation. Furthermore, patients with KPL (KRAS mutated with TP53 and LKB1) subtype, which was a novel subtype, had the shortest progression-free survival (PFS) in all types of KRAS co-mutation patients (P < .0001). The PFS and overall survival (OS) of patients with KRAS

conclusionOur study revealed that concurrent genomic alterations can further stratify KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients into various subgroups with distinctive therapeutic responses and differential survival outcomes. The KPL is a novel and less responsive subtype among KRAS-mutated NSCLC, and further investigation of effective treatment for this subtype is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAsian PeopleCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesKRAS protein, humanPemetrexedProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)STK11 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Chineseco-mutationheterogeneityKRASnon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID31709742
PMCPMC6943152
OpenAlexW2988286834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.