Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31709603›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2020

Utility of a next generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: A case study using the industrial chemical benzene.

Mirjam Luijten, Nicholas S Ball, Kerry L Dearfield, B Bhaskar Gollapudi, George E Johnson, Federica Madia, Lauren Peel, Stefan Pfuhler, Raja S Settivari, Wouter Ter Burg and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mirjam LuijtenCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Nicholas S BallThe Dow Chemical Company, Horgen, Switzerland.
Kerry L DearfieldBurke, Virginia.
B Bhaskar GollapudiCenter for Health Sciences, Exponent, Inc., Alexandria, Virginia.
George E JohnsonSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5643-9942
Federica MadiaEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Lauren PeelHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, District of Columbia.
Stefan PfuhlerProcter & Gamble, Mason, Ohio.
Raja S SettivariCorteva Agriscience, Newark, Delaware.
Wouter Ter BurgCentre for Safety of Substances and Products, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Paul A WhiteDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jan van BenthemCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

The Health and Environmental Sciences Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently published a next generation framework for assessing the risk of genomic damage via exposure to chemical substances. The framework entails a systematic approach with the aim to quantify risk levels for substances that induce genomic damage contributing to human adverse health outcomes. Here, we evaluated the utility of the framework for assessing the risk for industrial chemicals, using the case of benzene. Benzene is a well-studied substance that is generally considered a genotoxic carcinogen and is known to cause leukemia. The case study limits its focus on occupational and general population health as it relates to benzene exposure. Using the framework as guidance, available data on benzene considered relevant for assessment of genetic damage were collected. Based on these data, we were able to conduct quantitative analyses for relevant data sets to estimate acceptable exposure levels and to characterize the risk of genetic damage. Key observations include the need for robust exposure assessments, the importance of information on toxicokinetic properties, and the benefits of cheminformatics. The framework points to the need for further improvement on understanding of the mechanism(s) of action involved, which would also provide support for the use of targeted tests rather than a prescribed set of assays. Overall, this case study demonstrates the utility of the next generation framework to quantitatively model human risk on the basis of genetic damage, thereby enabling a new, innovative risk assessment concept. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:94-113, 2020. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Environmental Mutagen Society.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzeneCarcinogensDNA DamageEnvironmental ExposureHumansLeukemiaMutagenesisMutagenicity TestsMutagensOccupational ExposureRisk AssessmentBenzeneCarcinogensMutagensexposuregenotoxicityhuman health risk assessmentmutagenicitytesting strategy

Identifiers

PMID31709603
PMCPMC6972600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.