Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31709476›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2020

Heterogeneity of executive functions among preschool children with psychiatric symptoms.

Sini Teivaanmäki, Hanna Huhdanpää, Noona Kiuru, Eeva T Aronen, Vesa Närhi, Liisa Klenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sini TeivaanmäkiDepartment of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland. sini.teivaanmaki@nmi.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0575-7964
Hanna HuhdanpääLaboratory of Developmental Psychopathology, Pediatric Research Center, Child Psychiatry, Biomedicum Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1216-7417
Noona KiuruDepartment of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2334-8507
Eeva T AronenLaboratory of Developmental Psychopathology, Pediatric Research Center, Child Psychiatry, Biomedicum Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8756-8894
Vesa NärhiDepartment of Education, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2619-8364
Liisa KlenbergDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 21, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1600-8619
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Jyväskylä · FINiilo Mäki institute · FI

Funding

Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri TYH2013205Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri TYH2016202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate associations between internalizing and externalizing symptoms and deficits in executive functions (EF) as well as to examine the overall heterogeneity of EFs in a sample of preschool children attending a psychiatric clinic (n = 171). First, based on cut-off points signifying clinical levels of impairment on the parent-completed Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), children were assigned into groups of internalizing, externalizing, combined or mild symptoms and compared to a reference group (n = 667) with regard to day care teacher ratings of EFs on the Attention and Executive Function Rating Inventory-Preschool (ATTEX-P). Second, latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to identify distinct subgroups of children representing different EF profiles with unique strengths and weaknesses in EFs. The first set of analyses indicated that all symptom groups had more difficulties in EFs than the reference group did, and the internalizing group had less inhibition-related problems than the other symptom groups did. Using LPA, five EF profiles were identified: average, weak average, attentional problems, inhibitory problems, and overall problems. The EF profiles were significantly associated with gender, maternal education level, and psychiatric symptom type. Overall, the findings suggest that the comparison of means of internalizing and externalizing groups mainly captures the fairly obvious differences in inhibition-related domains among young psychiatric outpatient children, whereas the person-oriented approach, based on individual differences, identifies heterogeneity related to attentional functions, planning, and initiating one's action. The variability in EF difficulties suggests that a comprehensive evaluation of a child's EF profile is important regardless of the type of psychiatric symptoms the child presents with.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersExecutive functionsExternalizing symptomsInternalizing symptomsPreschoolPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID31709476
PMCPMC7497399
OpenAlexW2985465991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.