ArticleJSES open access2019
Reliability of a novel 3-dimensional computed tomography method for reverse shoulder arthroplasty postoperative evaluation.
Article in JSES open access, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic assistance improves reproducibility of planned glenoid baseplate inclination in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with navigation system in the Asian population: a retrospective comparative study.JSES international · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional planning, navigation, patient-specific instrumentation and mixed reality in shoulder arthroplasty: a digital orthopedic renaissance.EFORT open reviews · 2024Review
- Tomographic Analysis of Positioning of Reverse Baseplates Positioning.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-term function and survival of reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs) are reliant on component positioning and fixation. Conventional postoperative analysis is performed using plain radiographs or 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) images. Although 3-dimensional (3D) CT would be preferred, its use is limited by metal artifacts. This study proposes a new 3D CT method for postoperative RSA evaluation and compares its interobserver reliability with conventional methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsPreoperative and postoperative CT scans, as well as postoperative radiographs, were obtained from 18 patients who underwent RSA implantation; the scapula, implant, and screws were reconstructed as 3D CT models. The postoperative 3D scapula and implant were imported into preoperative coordinates and matched to the preoperative scapula. Standardized scapula coordinates were defined, in which the glenoid baseplate version and inclination angle were measured. The percentage of screw volume in bone was measured from a Boolean intersection operation between the preoperative scapula and screw models. Four independent reviewers performed the measurements using 3D CT and conventional 2D methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to compare the reliability of the methods.
resultsThe 3D CT method showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.75) in baseplate inclination (ICC = 0.92), version (ICC = 0.97), and screw volume in bone (ICC = 0.99). Conventional 2D methods demonstrated poor reliability (ICC < 0.4). For radiographs, inclination showed poor reliability (ICC = 0.09) and the screw percentage in bone showed fair reliability (ICC = 0.54). Version was not measured with plain radiographs. For 2D CT slice measurements, inclination showed poor reliability (ICC = 0.02), version showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.81), and the screw percentage in bone showed poor reliability (ICC = 0.28).
conclusionThe new 3D CT-based method for evaluating RSA glenoid implant positioning and screw volume in bone showed excellent reliability and overcame the metal-artifact limitation of postoperative CT and 3D CT reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.