Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31709351›Full record

ReviewJSES open access2019

Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Brandon C Cabarcas, Gregory L Cvetanovich, Anirudh K Gowd, Joseph N Liu, Brandon J Manderle, Nikhil N Verma

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JSES open access, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06611059 (Design of Patient Specific Guides), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06611059 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Design of Patient Specific Guides (PSG) for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauRan2023 to 2024Enrolled11ConditionsProximal Humeral FractureArmsPSG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Virtual reality and digital shoulder surgery].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Neurologic Complications in Shoulder Surgery: Anatomy, Mechanisms, and Surgical Recommendations.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Evaluation of the Baseplate Position and Screws in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using 3D Printed Patient-Specific Instrumentation.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Current trends in shoulder arthroplasty - Are the trends backed by evidence?Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon C CabarcasDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Gregory L CvetanovichDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Anirudh K GowdMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joseph N LiuLoma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Brandon J ManderleMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nikhil N VermaMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · USLoma Linda University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been significant recent emphasis on the use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty. However, clinical data are lacking to support the increased time and expense associated with PSI. Our purposes were to determine whether PSI significantly improves implantation accuracy during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to analyze available techniques and correlation with clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that PSI may improve glenoid component position radiographically but without correlation with clinical outcomes.

methodsThe MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. Included articles reported use of any preoperative or intraoperative PSI techniques, models, or guides to assist with TSA prosthesis implantation. The primary outcomes were mean deviation from the preoperative plan in version (in degrees), inclination (in degrees), and entry-point offset on the glenoid (in millimeters).

resultsAmong the included articles, 518 TSA procedures (352 anatomic and 166 reverse) were performed. The mean postoperative errors in both version and inclination angles were 5° or less in 20 articles (90.9%) using PSI. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in version error (

conclusionsMeta-analysis revealed no significant differences in accuracy between PSI and standard instrumentation. Although PSI may possess the potential to improve TSA techniques, further investigations regarding long-term clinical outcomes, impact on operating room time, and cost-effectiveness are warranted before PSI can be routinely recommended over conventional instrumentation.

Indexed as

3-dimensionalaccuracyarthroplastyglenoidguidePatient specificshoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31709351
PMCPMC6834995
OpenAlexW2974202067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.