Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31709303›Full record

ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2019

Novel box trainer for taTME - prospective evaluation among medical students.

Jakob Mann, Jens Rolinger, Steffen Axt, Andreas Kirschniak, Peter Wilhelm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jakob MannDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, DIAKOVERE Henriettenstift Hospital, Hannover, Germany.
Jens RolingerDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Steffen AxtDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Andreas KirschniakDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Peter WilhelmDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9690-1716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has been subject to extensive research and increasing clinical application. It allows further reduction of trauma by accessing via a natural orifice. Manifold platforms and instruments have been introduced and heterogeneity in surgical techniques exists. Because of the technique's complexity there is a persistent need for dedicated training devices and concepts. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe key steps of taTME were analyzed and a box trainer with three modules resembling these steps was designed and manufactured. Twenty-one surgically inexperienced medical students performed five repetitions of the three tasks with the new box trainer. Time and error count were analyzed for assessment of a learning curve.

resultsA significant reduction of processing time could be demonstrated for tasks 1-3 (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.001). The effect size was high for comparison of repetition 1 and 5 and decreased over the course (task 1: r = 0.88 vs. r = 0.21; task 2: r = 0.86 vs. r = 0.23; task 3: r = 0.74 vs. r = 0.44). Also, a significant reduction of errors was demonstrated for tasks 1 and 2. The decrease of effect size was analogously demonstrated.

conclusionsThe trainer might help to reduce the use of animal models for testing of platforms and instruments as well as gaining first-hand experience in transanal rectal resection.

Indexed as

box trainersurgical trainingtaTMEtransanal rectal resection

Identifiers

PMID31709303
PMCPMC6817727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.