ReviewFrontiers in oncology2019
Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Advanced Phase.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Targeting ABL Tyrosine Kinase in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and Computational Studies of Novel Thiazolone Derivatives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells inhibited chronic myeloid leukemia cells in vitro, correlating with oxidative stress.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Leveraging Model-Informed Drug Development to Predict Asciminib Efficacy in Second-Line Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and the T315IInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- KF1601, a dual inhibitor of BCR::ABL1 and FLT3, overcomes drug resistance in FLT3Molecular cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Potential role of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in the treatment of cancer: A contemporary nursing practice.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Accelerated-phase CML: de novo and transformed.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023Article
- Prognosis in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Baseline Factors, Dynamic Risk Assessment and Novel Insights.Cells · 2023Review
- Intracerebral hemorrhage as the first symptomatic manifestation of chronic myeloid leukemia (chronic phase): A case report and literature review.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
- Article
- Integrated genomic sequencing in myeloid blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (MBC-CML), identified potentially important findings in the context of leukemogenesis model.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of Resistance and Implications for Treatment Strategies in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia.Cancers · 2022Review
- Article
- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Part II-Cost of Care Among Patients in Advanced Phases or Later Lines of Therapy in Chronic Phase in the United States from a Commercial Perspective.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in advanced phases remains a challenge also in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. Cytogenetic clonal evolution and development of resistant mutations represent crucial events that limit the benefit of subsequent therapies in these patients. CML is diagnosed in accelerated (AP) or blast phase (BP) in <5% of patients, and the availability of effective treatments for chronic phase (CP) has dramatically reduced progressions on therapy. Due to smaller number of patients, few randomized studies are available in this setting and evidences are limited. Nevertheless, three main scenarios may be drawn: (a) patients diagnosed in AP are at higher risk of failure as compared to CP patients, but if they achieve optimal responses with frontline TKI treatment their outcome may be similarly favorable; (b) patients diagnosed in BP may be treated with TKI alone or with TKI together with conventional chemotherapy regimens, and subsequent transplant decisions should rely on kinetics of response and individual transplant risk; (c) patients in CP progressing under TKI treatment represent the most challenging population and they should be treated with alternative TKI according to the mutational profile, optional chemotherapy in BP patients, and transplant should be considered in suitable cases after return to second CP. Due to lack of validated and reliable markers to predict blast crisis and the still unsatisfactory results of treatments in this setting, prevention of progression by careful selection of frontline treatment in CP and early treatment intensification in non-optimal responders remains the main goal. Personalized evaluation of response kinetics could help in identifying patients at risk for progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.