Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31709173›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2019

Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Advanced Sarcoma and Neuroblastoma Pediatric Patients: Anti-cancer Treatment Preceding Monocyte Harvest Impairs the Immunostimulatory and Antigen-Presenting Behavior of DCs and Manufacturing Process Outcome.

Eva Hlavackova, Katerina Pilatova, Dasa Cerna, Iveta Selingerova, Peter Mudry, Pavel Mazanek, Lenka Fedorova, Jana Merhautova, Lucie Jureckova, Lukas Semerad and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Clinical implication of cellular vaccine in glioma: current advances and future prospects.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eva HlavackovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Katerina PilatovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Dasa CernaDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Iveta SelingerovaRegional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Peter MudryDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Pavel MazanekDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Lenka FedorovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Jana MerhautovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Lucie JureckovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Lukas SemeradDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Rita PacasovaTransfusion and Tissue Department, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Lucie FlajsarovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Lenka SouckovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Regina DemlovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Jaroslav SterbaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Dalibor ValikDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Lenka Zdrazilova-DubskaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Masaryk University · CZMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite efforts to develop novel treatment strategies, refractory and relapsing sarcoma, and high-risk neuroblastoma continue to have poor prognoses and limited overall survival. Monocyte-derived dendritic cell (DC)-based anti-cancer immunotherapy represents a promising treatment modality in these neoplasias. A DC-based anti-cancer vaccine was evaluated for safety in an academic phase-I/II clinical trial for children, adolescents, and young adults with progressive, recurrent, or primarily metastatic high-risk tumors, mainly sarcomas and neuroblastomas. The DC vaccine was loaded with self-tumor antigens obtained from patient tumor tissue. DC vaccine quality was assessed in terms of DC yield, viability, immunophenotype, production of IL-12 and IL-10, and stimulation of allogenic donor T-cells and autologous T-cells in allo-MLR and auto-MLR, respectively. Here, we show that the outcome of the manufacture of DC-based vaccine is highly variable in terms of both DC yield and DC immunostimulatory properties. In 30% of cases, manufacturing resulted in a product that failed to meet medicinal product specifications and therefore was not released for administration to a patient. Focusing on the isolation of monocytes and the pharmacotherapy preceding monocyte harvest, we show that isolation of monocytes by elutriation is not superior to adherence on plastic in terms of DC yield, viability, or immunostimulatory capacity. Trial patients having undergone monocyte-interfering pharmacotherapy prior to monocyte harvest was associated with an impaired DC-based immunotherapy product outcome. Certain combinations of anti-cancer treatment resulted in a similar pattern of inadequate DC parameters, namely, a combination of temozolomide with irinotecan was associated with DCs showing poor maturation and decreased immunostimulatory features, and a combination of pazopanib, topotecan, and MTD-based cyclophosphamide was associated with poor monocyte differentiation and decreased DC immunostimulatory parameters. Searching for a surrogate marker predicting an adverse outcome of DC manufacture in the peripheral blood complete blood count prior to monocyte harvest, we observed an association between an increased number of immature granulocytes in peripheral blood and decreased potency of the DC-based product as quantified by allo-MLR. We conclude that the DC-manufacturing yield and the immunostimulatory quality of anti-cancer DC-based vaccines generated from the monocytes of patients were not influenced by the monocyte isolation modality but were detrimentally affected by the specific combination of anti-cancer agents used prior to monocyte harvest.

Indexed as

anti-cancer medicationscell-based medicinal productsdendritic cellsinvestigator-initiated clinical trialmanufacturing outcome variabilityneuroblastomasarcoma

Identifiers

PMID31709173
PMCPMC6823179
OpenAlexW2982172372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.