ArticleGland surgery2019
Full breast reconstruction with fat and how to recycle the "dog-ear".
Article in Gland surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of the L-Scar Technique in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Health-Related Quality of Life After Breast Reconstruction: Comparing Outcomes Between Reconstruction Techniques Using the BREAST-Q.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Research trends and performances of breast reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Inspiring visualized surgery of the breast.Gland surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mastectomy without immediate reconstruction leaves us with a population of women who may need a new breast in a delayed fashion. These women are often elderly, not fit for major flap surgery or reluctant to have long scars or implants. Free fat grafting has mainly been used as an adjunct to other reconstructive methods. We present an option for delayed full breast reconstruction with free fat grafting alone. In some cases, we utilize the lateral excess as a flap in combination with fat grafting. Patient selection is crucial. A lady fitting this reconstruction method should have fat to donate, preferably in several different regions as well as redundant skin on the chest-wall and only minor radiation damage. Also, breast size requirements need to be sensible. The Fat is harvested in a closed system under general or local anesthesia. Following a few minutes decantation, the fat is put into syringes and injected from 4-6 entrance points into 3-4 layers with a blunt cannula. Depending on the width, height and thickness of the receiving chest wall, the transferred volume varies between 150-300 cc/operation. In general, 2-5 operations are needed to reconstruct a breast with fat alone. If the patient presents with lateral excess tissue, this can be utilized as a local, fasciocutaneous flap, de-epithelialized and rotated 180 degrees to support the inferior border of the new breast. This enables inferolateral definition and control of the breast footprint. The secret behind success in free fat grafting for full breast reconstruction lies in the small technical details and works safely and efficiently in a selected group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.