ArticleGland surgery2019
How to assess a CTA of the abdomen to plan an autologous breast reconstruction.
Article in Gland surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- How to approach the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap revision for optimal aesthetics.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Superficial vs. Deep Venous System in DIEP Flaps: Lessons from 25 Years of CTA-Guided Planning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Perforator Selection with Computed Tomography Angiography for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Multicentre Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- The Precision of Colour Doppler Ultrasonography Combined with Dynamic Infrared Thermography in Perforator Mapping for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Transforming breast reconstruction: the pioneering role of artificial intelligence in preoperative planning.Gland surgery · 2023Article
- A History of Innovation: Tracing the Evolution of Imaging Modalities for the Preoperative Planning of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- A Novel optimization technique of Computed Tomography Angiographic 3D-reconstructions for pre-operative planning of DIEP flaps.JPRAS open · 2023Article
- Tracing: A Simple Interpretation Method for the DIEP Flap CT Angiography to Help Operative Decision-making.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- Inspiring visualized surgery of the breast.Gland surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is recognised as the most popular option for autologous breast reconstruction. Planning of the DIEP flap involves pre-operative assessment of abdominal vascular anatomy with imaging, of which computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has become the mainstay. CTA enables detailed planning of a range of surgical steps, leading to reduced operative times and improved surgical outcomes. The value of CTA is only demonstrated when the relevant vascular anatomy is able to be demonstrated and appraised. For optimal analysis, a 64-slice multi-detector row CT scanner and imaging software including OsiriX™, Siemens InSpace™ or Horos™ are required. The seven major steps to consider include: (I) perforator size; (II) perforator angiosome; (III) intramuscular course; (IV) deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) pedicle; (V) venous anatomy; (VI) superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV); and (VII) abdominal wall structure. These steps should also be reviewed when marking the patient and planning the flap intra-operatively. While CTA has superior sensitivity and specificity in mapping perforator anatomy it also faces challenges due to ionising radiation exposure, contrast-induced allergy and potential nephrotoxicity. Despite these challenges, the benefits of CTA to the individual patient has maintained its role in pre-operative planning of the DIEP flap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.