Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31709120›Full record

ArticleStroke and vascular neurology2019

Flow diversion covering the M1 origin as a last resort.

Li-Mei Lin, Matthew T Bender, Geoffrey P Colby, Bowen Jiang, Jessica K Campos, David A Zarrin, Robert W C Young, Risheng Xu, Justin M Caplan, Judy Huang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Endoluminal flow diverters in the treatment of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and angiographic outcomes.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Li-Mei LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
Matthew T BenderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Geoffrey P ColbyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Bowen JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jessica K CamposDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1075-0764
David A ZarrinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Robert W C YoungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Risheng XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Justin M CaplanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Judy HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Rafael J TamargoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Alexander L CoonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1105-4333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInternal carotid artery termination (ICAT) and proximal A1 aneurysms can be challenging for open surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. Treatment with flow diversion covering the middle cerebral artery (MCA), an end vessel supplying a terminal circulation, has not been reported.

methodsA prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved database was analysed for patients with pipeline embolisation device (PED) placement from the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) to the ICA during cerebral aneurysm treatment.

resultsNine cases were identified, including five proximal A1, three posterior communicating artery and one ICAT aneurysm locations. Average aneurysm size was 8.3 mm (range 3-17), with 67% saccular and 78% right-sided. Primary indication for treatment was significant dome irregularity (44%), recurrence or enlargement (33%), underlying collagen vascular disorder (11%) and traumatic pseudoaneurysm (11%). Preservation of the ipsilateral ACA (with PED placed in A1) was performed when the anterior communicating artery (67%) or contralateral A1 (33%) were absent on angiography. Adjunctive coiling was done in four cases (44%). There was one major stroke leading to mortality (11%) and one minor stroke (11%). Clinical follow-up was 27 months on average. Follow-up digital subtraction angiography (average interval 15 months) showed complete aneurysm obliteration (88%) or dome occlusion with entry remnant (12%). The jailed MCA showed minimal or mild delay (primarily anterograde flow) in 75% of cases and significant delay (reliance primarily on ACA and external carotid artery collaterals) in 25%.

conclusionsCovering the MCA with a flow diverting stent should be reserved for select rare cases. Strict attention to blood pressure augmentation during the periprocedural period is necessary to minimise potential ischaemic compromise.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationStentsAnterior Cerebral ArteryBlood PressureCarotid Artery, InternalDatabases, FactualEndovascular ProceduresHumansIntracranial AneurysmIschemic StrokeRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeaneurysmcoilflow diverterinterventiontechnique

Identifiers

PMID31709120
PMCPMC6812635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.