Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31709050›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational immunology2019

Idiopathic and immune-related pulmonary fibrosis: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

Andrew McLean-Tooke, Irene Moore, Fiona Lake

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2020
    Article
  18. Immunopathobiology of chronic lung disease.Clinical & translational immunology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew McLean-TookeDepartment of Clinical Immunology Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Perth WA Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4307-0837
Irene MooreDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth WA Australia.
Fiona LakeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Perth WA Australia.
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AUFiona Stanley Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a large group of pulmonary conditions sharing common clinical, radiological and histopathological features as a consequence of fibrosis of the lung interstitium. The majority of ILDs are idiopathic in nature with possible genetic predisposition, but is also well recognised as a complication of connective tissue disease or with certain environmental, occupational or drug exposures. In recent years, a concerted international effort has been made to standardise the diagnostic criteria in ILD subtypes, formalise multidisciplinary pathways and standardise treatment recommendations. In this review, we discuss some of the current challenges around ILD diagnostics, the role of serological testing, especially, in light of the new classification of Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features (IPAF) and discuss the evidence for therapies targeted at idiopathic and immune-related pulmonary fibrosis.

Indexed as

connective tissue diseasediagnosisinterstitial lung diseases (ILDs)pulmonary fibrosistherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID31709050
PMCPMC6831929
OpenAlexW2985143930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.