ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019
A Bioinformatics Guide to Plant Microbiome Analysis.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Meta-Analysis Approach to Defining the Culturable Core of Plant Endophytic Bacterial Communities.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Pooled it
- Exploring sagebrush leaf microbial metagenomes from deep, host-derived sequencing.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Chemical Signaling and Metabolomic Crosstalk in Endophytic Fungi-Medicinal Plant Symbioses for Natural Product Discovery and Sustainable Bioproduction.Metabolites · 2026Review
- SyFi: generating and using sequence fingerprints to distinguish SynCom isolates.Microbial genomics · 2025Article
- Optimization of the Method for Isolating Bacterial DNA from the Aboveground Part of Lettuce.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Embracing complexity in plant-microbiome systems.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Review
- Distinct changes in tomato-associated multi-kingdom microbiomes during Meloidogyne incognita parasitism.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Unraveling the interplay between root exudates, microbiota, and rhizosheath formation in pearl millet.Microbiome · 2024Article
- Article
- Harnessing rhizospheric core microbiomes from arid regions for enhancing date palm resilience to climate change effects.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Omics approaches in understanding the benefits of plant-microbe interactions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Pathogen Eradication in Garlic in the Phytobiome Context: Should We Aim for Complete Cleaning?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Multi-Label Learning Framework for Predicting Chemical Classes and Biological Activities of Natural Products from Biosynthetic Gene Clusters.Journal of chemical ecology · 2023Article
- Big Data for a Small World: A Review on Databases and Resources for Studying Microbiomes.Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2023Review
- The Arabidopsis holobiont: a (re)source of insights to understand the amazing world of plant-microbe interactions.Environmental microbiome · 2023Review
- Comparative metabolomic study of fungal foliar endophytes and their long-lived hostFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Characterization of endophytic bacteriome diversity and associated beneficial bacteria inhabiting a macrophyteFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Bioinformatics in Plant Breeding and Research on Disease Resistance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Estimation of the impact of three different bioinformatic pipelines on sheep nemabiome analysis.Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Primer Choice and Xylem-Microbiome-Extraction Method Are Important Determinants in Assessing Xylem Bacterial Community in Olive Trees.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent evidence for intimate relationship of plants with their microbiota shows that plants host individual and diverse microbial communities that are essential for their survival. Understanding their relatedness using genome-based and high-throughput techniques remains a hot topic in microbiome research. Molecular analysis of the plant holobiont necessitates the application of specific sampling and preparatory steps that also consider sources of unwanted information, such as soil, co-amplified plant organelles, human DNA, and other contaminations. Here, we review state-of-the-art and present practical guidelines regarding experimental and computational aspects to be considered in molecular plant-microbiome studies. We discuss sequencing and "omics" techniques with a focus on the requirements needed to adapt these methods to individual research approaches. The choice of primers and sequence databases is of utmost importance for amplicon sequencing, while the assembly and binning of shotgun metagenomic sequences is crucial to obtain quality data. We discuss specific bioinformatic workflows to overcome the limitation of genome database resources and for covering large eukaryotic genomes such as fungi. In transcriptomics, it is necessary to account for the separation of host mRNA or dual-RNAseq data. Metaproteomics approaches provide a snapshot of the protein abundances within a plant tissue which requires the knowledge of complete and well-annotated plant genomes, as well as microbial genomes. Metabolomics offers a powerful tool to detect and quantify small molecules and molecular changes at the plant-bacteria interface if the necessary requirements with regard to (secondary) metabolite databases are considered. We highlight data integration and complementarity which should help to widen our understanding of the interactions among individual players of the plant holobiont in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.