Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31708936›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Uniform Expression and Relatively Small Position Effects Characterize Sister Transformants in Maize and Soybean.

Scott D Betts, Sutirtha Basu, Joy Bolar, Russ Booth, Shujun Chang, A Mark Cigan, Jeffry Farrell, Huirong Gao, Kristi Harkins, Anthony Kinney and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Proteomic Analysis of Lotus-DerivedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Maize transformation: history, progress, and perspectives.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott D BettsCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Sutirtha BasuCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Joy BolarCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Russ BoothCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Shujun ChangBenson Hill Biosystems, Inc. St. Louis, MO, United States.
A Mark CiganGenus PLC, DeForest, WI, United States.
Jeffry FarrellCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Huirong GaoCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Kristi HarkinsCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Anthony KinneyCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Brian LendertsCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Zhongsen LiKenfeng Seed, Harbin, China.
Lu LiuCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Michelle McEnanyCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Jasdeep MuttiCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Dave PetersonCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Jeffry D SanderCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Chris ScelongeKWS Gateway Research Center, LLC, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Xiaoyi SopkoCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Dave StuckerCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Emily WuCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
N Doane ChilcoatCorteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Corteva (United States) · USBenson Hill Biosystems (United States) · USGenus (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of transgenic cell lines or organisms for industrial, agricultural, or medicinal applications involves inserting DNA into the target genome in a way that achieves efficacious transgene expression without a deleterious impact on fitness. The genomic insertion site is widely recognized as an important determinant of success. However, the effect of chromosomal location on transgene expression and fitness has not been systematically investigated in plants. Here we evaluate the importance of transgene insertion site in maize and soybean using both random and site-specific transgene integration. We have compared the relative contribution of genomic location on transgene expression levels with other factors, including cis-regulatory elements, neighboring transgenes, genetic background, and zygosity. As expected, cis-regulatory elements and the presence/absence of nearby transgene neighbors can impact transgene expression. Surprisingly, we determined not only that genomic location had the least impact on transgene expression compared to the other factors that were investigated but that the majority of insertion sites recovered supported transgene expression levels that were statistically not distinguishable. All 68 genomic sites evaluated were capable of supporting high-level transgene expression, which was also consistent across generations. Furthermore, multilocation field evaluation detected no to little decrease in agronomic performance as a result of transgene insertion at the vast majority of sites we evaluated with a single construct in five maize hybrid backgrounds.

Indexed as

insertion siteposition effectsite-specific integrationtransformanttransgene expression

Identifiers

PMID31708936
PMCPMC6821721
OpenAlexW2972154765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.