Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31708892›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

A Simple and Robust Statistical Method to Define Genetic Relatedness of Samples Related to Outbreaks at the Genomic Scale - Application to Retrospective

Nicolas Radomski, Sabrina Cadel-Six, Emeline Cherchame, Arnaud Felten, Pauline Barbet, Federica Palma, Ludovic Mallet, Simon Le Hello, François-Xavier Weill, Laurent Guillier and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Polyphyly in widespreadFrontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicolas RadomskiANSES, Laboratory for Food Safety, Université PARIS-EST, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Sabrina Cadel-SixANSES, Laboratory for Food Safety, Université PARIS-EST, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Emeline CherchameANSES, Laboratory for Food Safety, Université PARIS-EST, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Arnaud FeltenANSES, Laboratory for Food Safety, Université PARIS-EST, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Pauline BarbetANSES, Laboratory for Food Safety, Université PARIS-EST, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Federica PalmaANSES, Laboratory for Food Safety, Université PARIS-EST, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Ludovic MalletANSES, Laboratory for Food Safety, Université PARIS-EST, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Simon Le HelloUnité des Bactéries Pathogènes Entériques, Institut Pasteur, Centre National de Référence des Salmonella, Paris, France.
François-Xavier WeillUnité des Bactéries Pathogènes Entériques, Institut Pasteur, Centre National de Référence des Salmonella, Paris, France.
Laurent GuillierANSES, Laboratory for Food Safety, Université PARIS-EST, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Michel-Yves MistouANSES, Laboratory for Food Safety, Université PARIS-EST, Maisons-Alfort, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The investigation of foodborne outbreaks (FBOs) from genomic data typically relies on inspecting the relatedness of samples through a phylogenomic tree computed on either SNPs, genes, kmers, or alleles (i.e., cgMLST and wgMLST). The phylogenomic reconstruction is often time-consuming, computation-intensive and depends on hidden assumptions, pipelines implementation and their parameterization. In the context of FBO investigations, robust links between isolates are required in a timely manner to trigger appropriate management actions. Here, we propose a non-parametric statistical method to assert the relatedness of samples (i.e., outbreak cases) or whether to reject them (i.e., non-outbreak cases). With typical computation running within minutes on a desktop computer, we benchmarked the ability of three non-parametric statistical tests (i.e., Wilcoxon rank-sum, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Kruskal-Wallis) on six different genomic features (i.e., SNPs, SNPs excluding recombination events, genes, kmers, cgMLST alleles, and wgMLST alleles) to discriminate outbreak cases (i.e., positive control: C+) from non-outbreak cases (i.e., negative control: C-). We leveraged four well-characterized and retrospectively investigated FBOs of

Indexed as

12:i:-)4[5]cgMLSTgeneskmersmonophasic S. Typhimurium (S. 1outbreak investigationSalmonella TyphimuriumSNPswgMLST

Identifiers

PMID31708892
PMCPMC6821717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.