ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Auditory Predictions and Prediction Errors in Response to Self-Initiated Vowels.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered Timing of Self-Voice Processing in Parkinson's Disease.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying the Phenomenon of Inner Speaking-Induced Suppression.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Mood modulations of emotional word processing: A predictive perspective view of EEG data.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Auditory N1 Suppression and Omission N1 Do Not Share a Common Underlying Mechanism.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Gamma and Theta/Alpha-Band Oscillations in the Electroencephalogram Distinguish the Content of Inner Speech.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Harmonic vowels and neural dynamics: MEG evidence for auditory resonance integration in singing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Does pre-speech auditory modulation reflect processes related to feedback monitoring or speech movement planning?Neuroscience letters · 2024Article
- Hallucination Proneness Alters Sensory Feedback Processing in Self-voice Production.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
- Article
- Somatosensory omissions reveal action-related predictive processing.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Short-Term Effect of Auditory Stimulation on Neural Activities: A Scoping Review of Longitudinal Electroencephalography and Magnetoencephalography Studies.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Stimulus-Specific Prediction Error Neurons in Mouse Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Stimulus-specific prediction error neurons in mouse auditory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Precise movement-based predictions in the mouse auditory cortex.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Event-Related Potential Correlates of Learning to Produce Novel Foreign Phonemes.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Intention-based predictive information modulates auditory deviance processing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Intention-based and sensory-based predictions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Expectancy changes the self-monitoring of voice identity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been suggested that speech production is accomplished by an internal forward model, reducing processing activity directed to self-produced speech in the auditory cortex. The current study uses an established N1-suppression paradigm comparing self- and externally initiated natural speech sounds to answer two questions: (1) Are forward predictions generated to process complex speech sounds, such as vowels, initiated via a button press? (2) Are prediction errors regarding self-initiated deviant vowels reflected in the corresponding ERP components? Results confirm an N1-suppression in response to self-initiated speech sounds. Furthermore, our results suggest that predictions leading to the N1-suppression effect are specific, as self-initiated deviant vowels do not elicit an N1-suppression effect. Rather, self-initiated deviant vowels elicit an enhanced N2b and P3a compared to externally generated deviants, externally generated standard, or self-initiated standards, again confirming prediction specificity. Results show that prediction errors are salient in self-initiated auditory speech sounds, which may lead to more efficient error correction in speech production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.