Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31708656›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2019

Cross-Canada differences in early-stage breast cancer treatment and acute-care use.

M Powis, P Groome, N Biswanger, C Kendell, K M Decker, E Grunfeld, M L McBride, R Urquhart, M Winget, G A Porter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

M PowisDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
P GroomeDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
N BiswangerEpidemiology and Cancer Registry Department, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
C KendellCancer Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS.
K M DeckerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
E GrunfeldDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
M L McBrideCancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC.
R UrquhartDalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
M WingetStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, U.S.A.
G A PorterDepartment of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth ii Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS.
M K KrzyzanowskaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
CancerCare Manitoba · CADalhousie University · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre · CAQueen's University · CAStanford University · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR 128272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy has improved outcomes in early-stage breast cancer, but treatment practices vary, and use of acute care is common. We conducted a pan-Canadian study to describe treatment differences and the incidence of emergency department visits (edvs), edvs leading to hospitalization (edvhs), and direct hospitalizations (hs) during adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: The cohort consisted of women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (stages i-iii) during 2007-2012 in British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, or Nova Scotia who underwent curative surgery. Parallel provincial analyses were undertaken using linked clinical, registry, and administrative databases. The incidences of edvs, edvhs, and hs in the 6 months after treatment initiation were examined for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The cohort consisted of 50,224 patients. The proportion of patients who received chemotherapy varied by province, with Ontario having the highest proportion (46.4%), and Nova Scotia, the lowest proportion (38.0%). Age, stage, receptor status, comorbidities, and geographic location were associated with receipt of chemotherapy in all provinces. Ontario had the highest proportion of patients experiencing an edv (36.1%), but the lowest proportion experiencing h (6.4%). Conversely, British Columbia had the lowest proportion of patients experiencing an edv (16.0%), but the highest proportion experiencing h (26.7%). The proportion of patients having an edvh was similar across provinces (13.9%-16.8%). Geographic location was associated with edvs, edvhs, and hs in all provinces. Conclusions: Intra- and inter-provincial differences in the use of chemotherapy and acute care were observed. Understanding variations in care can help to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement and shared learnings.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCanadaChemotherapy, AdjuvantEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMiddle Agedadministrative dataBreast canceremergency department visitshospitalizationssystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID31708656
PMCPMC6821122
OpenAlexW2981498497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.