Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31708654›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2019

Descriptive analysis of dosing and outcomes for patients with ibrutinib-treated relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a Canadian centre.

K Uminski, K Brown, O Bucher, I Hibbert, D H Dhaliwal, J B Johnston, M Geirnaert, D E Dawe, V Banerji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

K UminskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
K BrownDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
O BucherDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
I HibbertDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
D H DhaliwalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
J B JohnstonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
M GeirnaertDepartment of Pharmacy, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
D E DaweDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
V BanerjiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ibrutinib is an approved treatment for relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (cll) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (sll). The effect of ibrutinib dose reduction compared with discontinuation in a population-based setting is unclear. Methods: To examine the patterns of ibrutinib use in a Canadian population-based setting, we analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory cll or sll treated with ibrutinib. Results: The 64 patients diagnosed with cll or sll had a median age of 76.5 years. Most had unmutated ighv (immunoglobulin variable heavy chain). A hematologic response occurred in 39 patients regardless of the ibrutinib dose. The most common toxicities were infection, bruising or bleeding, and musculoskeletal problems, with a median time to first toxicity of 14 days. More than half the cohort experienced a dose reduction, with musculoskeletal problems, cytopenias, and infection being the leading causes; surgery was the most frequent indication for holding treatment. Only 26 of the 64 patients (40.6%) stayed on the recommended maximal dose of ibrutinib. No differences in reported toxicities or hematologic response rates were evident between the patients receiving maximal and submaximal therapy. At the end of the study period, 53 patients from the initial cohort remained on ibrutinib. Conclusions: More than half the study patients received ibrutinib therapy at a submaximal dose without evidence of increased frequency of toxicities or disease progression. The rate of ibrutinib discontinuation was lower in our cohort than has been reported in other settings. Submaximal ibrutinib dosing will have to be further systematically evaluated.

Indexed as

AdenineAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCanadaFemaleHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeAdenineAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsBTK protein, humanibrutinibPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidineschronic lymphocytic leukemiaclinical responseIbrutinibsmall lymphocytic lymphomatoxicity

Identifiers

PMID31708654
PMCPMC6821120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.