Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31708612›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry

A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up.

Preeti Jha, Mandeep S Virdi, Suman Nain

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05305417 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cell-free Autologous Regenerative Endodontics Treatment for Permanent Mature Teeth With Pulp Necrosis and Periapical Lesions: a Randomized, Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial (CARETT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de ValparaisoRan2023 to 2025Enrolled228ConditionsPeriapical Diseases, Pulp NecrosesArmsAutologous Regenerative Endodontic Treatment, Conventional Root Canal Treatment
NCT06086249 naunknown statusnot on this map

Clinical and Radiographic Success of Regeneration Using Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Root Canal Treatment in Mature Permanent Molars With Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsApical PeriodontitisArmsRegeneration using Injectable platelet-rich fibrin, Root canal treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Tissue Characteristics in Endodontic Regeneration: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Importance of PairedInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Preeti JhaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PDM Dental College and Research Institute, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India.
Mandeep S VirdiDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PDM Dental College and Research Institute, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India.
Suman NainDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PDM Dental College and Research Institute, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimSealBio is a novel technique which stimulates the periradicular cells to deposit a biological barrier at the root apex by inducing healing and regeneration. This clinical trial was undertaken to compare the outcome of teeth treated with the SealBio and the obturation technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the SealBio and the obturation group. The time taken for both the techniques and periapical healing was evaluated. The patients of both the groups were evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months follow up. The periapical index (PAI) was the primary outcome measure to check the apical bone density and healing. The secondary outcome measure was the presence/absence of signs and symptoms. The final outcome measure was the sum of the primary and secondary outcome measures. RESULTS AND

conclusionThe time taken to perform endodontic treatment with the SealBio technique was significantly lesser than that of obturation. Both groups showed equally favorable outcomes at the end of 18 months without any statistically significant differences. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the present study have demonstrated that SealBio technique gives similar results as that of conventional gutta-percha obturation. The shortcomings of obturation such as difficulty in obtaining a fluid-tight seal and difficulty in obturating tortuous canals can be overcome by the SealBio method. The SealBio method is cost effective, less technique sensitive, and takes lesser chair time. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Jha P, Virdi MS,

Indexed as

Apical periodontitisMature teethNecrotic pulpPeriapical abscessRegenerative endodonticsSealBio

Identifiers

PMID31708612
PMCPMC6811939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.